본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Ultrasonographic characteristics of Hürthle cell neoplasms: prediction of malignancy.

1/5 보강
Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) 2022 Vol.41(4) p. 689-697
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: Hürthle cell neoplasms (HCNs) of the thyroid gland
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The US findings associated with malignancy were explored using logistic regression analysis, and the diagnostic performance and cutoff were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Kim MJ, Shin JH, Hahn SY, Oh YL, Kim SW, Kim TH

📖 무료 전문 🟢 PMC 전문 PMC9532204
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] This study investigated the ultrasound (US) features of malignancy in patients with Hürthle cell neoplasms (HCNs) of the thyroid gland.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P<0.001
  • Sensitivity 53.1%
  • Specificity 87.9%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Kim MJ, Shin JH, et al. (2022). Ultrasonographic characteristics of Hürthle cell neoplasms: prediction of malignancy.. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 41(4), 689-697. https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.21264
MLA Kim MJ, et al.. "Ultrasonographic characteristics of Hürthle cell neoplasms: prediction of malignancy.." Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), vol. 41, no. 4, 2022, pp. 689-697.
PMID 36031766 ↗
DOI 10.14366/usg.21264

Abstract

[PURPOSE] This study investigated the ultrasound (US) features of malignancy in patients with Hürthle cell neoplasms (HCNs) of the thyroid gland.

[METHODS] The present study included 139 HCNs that had undergone surgical excision at a single institution from 1996 to 2020 and had preoperative US images. The sonographic characteristics of HCNs were correlated with their pathological results. The US findings associated with malignancy were explored using logistic regression analysis, and the diagnostic performance and cutoff were assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

[RESULTS] The most common US findings of HCNs were a solid content (76.3%), oval to round shape (100%), hypoechogenicity (70.5%), a smooth margin (95.0%), the halo sign (90.6%), and no calcifications (93.5%). HCNs were commonly smaller in pathologic measurements than in US measurements (smaller, same, and greater than US measurements in 60.4%, 21.6%, and 18.0% of HCNs, respectively; P<0.001). On US, malignant nodules were significantly larger than benign nodules (3.4±1.6 cm vs. 2.2±1.2 cm, P<0.001). Multiple logistic regression showed that the US tumor size was an independent predictor of malignancy (P=0.001; odds ratio, 1.730 for a 1-cm increase [95% confidence interval, 1.258 to 2.375]). The best cutoff US tumor size for predicting malignancy was 3.35 cm (sensitivity, 53.1%; specificity, 87.9%).

[CONCLUSION] The US tumor size was found to be an independent predictor of malignancy in HCNs, and a US tumor size >3.35 cm might be used as a criterion to suggest malignancy. The size of HCNs often showed discrepancies between US and pathologic measurements.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기