In vitro fertilization with concurrent pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Fertility and sterility 1988 Vol.49(1) p. 96-9

Roh SI, Dodds WG, Park JM, Awadalla SG, Friedman CI, Kim MH

Abstract

The recent advent of ultrasound-guided follicular aspiration by various approaches now allows access to ovaries previously deemed inaccessible by laparoscopy; however, a small group of candidates for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) require laparotomy for associated gynecologic disorders. Twenty-five IVF-ET cycles at the time of laparotomy were compared with 309 IVF-ET cycles in which oocytes were retrieved laparoscopically. Five pregnancies occurred in the IVF-ET cycle with laparotomy and one pregnancy occurred spontaneously following microsurgical tubal reconstruction. The pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 25% in the laparotomy IVF-ET patients compared with 15.4% for the laparoscopy IVF-ET group. Obvious advantages of combining IVF-ET and pelvic reconstructive surgery include a single anesthesia exposure and economic benefits. Patients with a long history of infertility undergoing tubal reconstructive surgery may be offered combined IVF-ET. Extended anesthesia exposure with pelvic surgery demonstrated no adverse effects on the pregnancy rate.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 ovaries scispacy 1
합병증 pelvic scispacy 1
질환 gynecologic disorders C0017411
Female Genital Diseases
scispacy 1
질환 infertility C0021359
Infertility
scispacy 1
기타 ultrasound-guided follicular scispacy 1
기타 patients scispacy 1
기타 tubal scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Clomiphene; Embryo Transfer; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Microsurgery; Oocytes; Ovulation Induction; Surgery, Plastic