본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

ESTIMation of the ABiLity of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection to modify outcomes in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
Trials 📖 저널 OA 94.9% 2023 Vol.24(1) p. 298
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
598 patients (299 per group).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[TRIAL REGISTRATION] NCT03570021. June 26,2018.

Hartl D, Godbert Y, Carrat X, Bardet S, Lasne-Cardon A, Vera P, Ilies E, Zerdoud S, Sarini J, Zalzali M, La Manna L, Schneegans O, Kelly A, Kauffmann P, Rodien P, Brunaud L, Grunenwald S, Housseau E, Laghouati S, Bouvet N, Lecerf E, Hadoux J, Lamartina L, Schlumberger M, Borget I

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically low-risk cT1bT2N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial, due to a large number of conflicting retrospective studies, some showing

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Hartl D, Godbert Y, et al. (2023). ESTIMation of the ABiLity of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection to modify outcomes in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective randomized trial.. Trials, 24(1), 298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07294-0
MLA Hartl D, et al.. "ESTIMation of the ABiLity of prophylactic central compartment neck dissection to modify outcomes in low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective randomized trial.." Trials, vol. 24, no. 1, 2023, pp. 298.
PMID 37118818

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically low-risk cT1bT2N0 papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial, due to a large number of conflicting retrospective studies, some showing an advantage in terms of locoregional recurrence, others showing no advantage. These previous studies all show high rates of excellent response. We aim to demonstrate the non-inferiority of thyroidectomy alone as compared to total thyroidectomy with prophylactic central neck dissection in conjunction with adjuvant RAI 30 mCi with rTSH stimulation in terms of excellent response at 1 year.

[TRIAL DESIGN AND METHODS] Prospective randomized open multicenter phase III trial including patients with 11-40-mm papillary thyroid carcinoma (Bethesda VI) or suspicious cytology (Bethesda V) confirmed malignant on intra-operative frozen section analysis, with no suspicious lymph nodes on a specialized preoperative ultrasound examination. Patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: the reference group total thyroidectomy with bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection, and the comparator group total thyroidectomy alone. All patients will receive an ablative dose of 30mCi of radioactive iodine (RAI) within 4 months of surgery. The primary outcome is to compare the rate of excellent response at 1 year after surgery between the groups, as defined by an unstimulated serum thyroglobulin (Tg) level ≤ 0.2 ng/mL with no anti-Tg antibodies, an normal neck ultrasound and no ectopic uptake on the post-RAI scintiscan. Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the rate of patients with excellent response at 1 year after randomization does not differ by more than 5%. Setting the significance level at 0.025 (one-sided) and a power of 80% requires a sample size of 598 patients (299 per group). Secondary outcomes are to compare Tg levels at 8 +/- 2 postoperative weeks, before RAI ablation, the rate of excellent response at 3 and 5 years, the rate of other responses at 1, 3, and 5 years (biochemical incomplete, indeterminate, and structurally incomplete responses), complications, quality of life, and cost-utility.

[DISCUSSION (POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS)] If non-inferiority is demonstrated with this high-level evidence, prophylactic neck dissection will have been shown to not be necessary in clinically low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION] NCT03570021. June 26,2018.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)

🟢 PMC 전문 열기