Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
8 patients, = 10 physicians) showed that the PtDAs were highly acceptable and usable for decision-making.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
two rounds of alpha testing, revisions, and beta testing
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Evidence-based PtDAs were created for patients with DTC for two different treatment decisions. Our final version was judged to be clear, balanced, and helpful in decision-making.
[BACKGROUND] Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making.
APA
Koot A, Hermens R, et al. (2023). Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.. Frontiers in endocrinology, 14, 1162537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1162537
MLA
Koot A, et al.. "Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.." Frontiers in endocrinology, vol. 14, 2023, pp. 1162537.
PMID
37324263 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making. Two important treatment decisions for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), which could benefit from PtDAs, are as follows (1): the extent of surgery decision in patients with low-risk DTC and (2) the decision to start or delay starting the treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced tumors.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] PtDAs for these two decisions were developed using the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) quality criteria in an iterative process of prototype development alpha and beta testing by patients and physicians. The information content of the PtDAs was based on the available literature, current guidelines, and patient's needs, preferences, and values.
[RESULTS] The web-based PtDAs underwent two rounds of alpha testing, revisions, and beta testing. The PtDAs have the same structure, consisting of six steps: a general introduction, information about the treatment options, comparing the treatment options, knowledge questions, a values clarification exercise, and saving the information. The alpha testing ( = 8 patients, = 10 physicians) showed that the PtDAs were highly acceptable and usable for decision-making. Results of the beta testing in 20 patients showed that two patients did not use the PtDA; the other 18 patients found that the PtDAs were readable ( = 17) and helpful ( = 14) for decision-making. All patients recommend using the PtDAs.
[CONCLUSIONS] Evidence-based PtDAs were created for patients with DTC for two different treatment decisions. Our final version was judged to be clear, balanced, and helpful in decision-making.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] PtDAs for these two decisions were developed using the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) quality criteria in an iterative process of prototype development alpha and beta testing by patients and physicians. The information content of the PtDAs was based on the available literature, current guidelines, and patient's needs, preferences, and values.
[RESULTS] The web-based PtDAs underwent two rounds of alpha testing, revisions, and beta testing. The PtDAs have the same structure, consisting of six steps: a general introduction, information about the treatment options, comparing the treatment options, knowledge questions, a values clarification exercise, and saving the information. The alpha testing ( = 8 patients, = 10 physicians) showed that the PtDAs were highly acceptable and usable for decision-making. Results of the beta testing in 20 patients showed that two patients did not use the PtDA; the other 18 patients found that the PtDAs were readable ( = 17) and helpful ( = 14) for decision-making. All patients recommend using the PtDAs.
[CONCLUSIONS] Evidence-based PtDAs were created for patients with DTC for two different treatment decisions. Our final version was judged to be clear, balanced, and helpful in decision-making.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
- Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Shared Decision Making in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Position paper from the Endocrine Task Force of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) on the management and shared decision making in patients with low-risk micro papillary thyroid carcinoma.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.