본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.

1/5 보강
Frontiers in endocrinology 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 2/2 OA 2022: 120/120 OA 2023: 125/125 OA 2024: 102/102 OA 2025: 137/137 OA 2026: 48/48 OA 2021~2026 2023 Vol.14() p. 1162537
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
8 patients, = 10 physicians) showed that the PtDAs were highly acceptable and usable for decision-making.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
two rounds of alpha testing, revisions, and beta testing
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Evidence-based PtDAs were created for patients with DTC for two different treatment decisions. Our final version was judged to be clear, balanced, and helpful in decision-making.

Koot A, Hermens R, Ottevanger P, Netea-Maier R, Stalmeier P

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Koot A, Hermens R, et al. (2023). Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.. Frontiers in endocrinology, 14, 1162537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1162537
MLA Koot A, et al.. "Patient decision aids for patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: development process and alpha and beta testing.." Frontiers in endocrinology, vol. 14, 2023, pp. 1162537.
PMID 37324263 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making. Two important treatment decisions for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), which could benefit from PtDAs, are as follows (1): the extent of surgery decision in patients with low-risk DTC and (2) the decision to start or delay starting the treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with advanced tumors.

[MATERIAL AND METHODS] PtDAs for these two decisions were developed using the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) quality criteria in an iterative process of prototype development alpha and beta testing by patients and physicians. The information content of the PtDAs was based on the available literature, current guidelines, and patient's needs, preferences, and values.

[RESULTS] The web-based PtDAs underwent two rounds of alpha testing, revisions, and beta testing. The PtDAs have the same structure, consisting of six steps: a general introduction, information about the treatment options, comparing the treatment options, knowledge questions, a values clarification exercise, and saving the information. The alpha testing ( = 8 patients, = 10 physicians) showed that the PtDAs were highly acceptable and usable for decision-making. Results of the beta testing in 20 patients showed that two patients did not use the PtDA; the other 18 patients found that the PtDAs were readable ( = 17) and helpful ( = 14) for decision-making. All patients recommend using the PtDAs.

[CONCLUSIONS] Evidence-based PtDAs were created for patients with DTC for two different treatment decisions. Our final version was judged to be clear, balanced, and helpful in decision-making.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기