Artificial Intelligence Model Assisting Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis and Management: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
6163 patients in a tertiary hospital (Ajou University Medical Center; AUMC).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The interobserver agreement improved from moderate to substantial in both groups. [CONCLUSION] AI-Thyroid can improve diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in thyroid cancer diagnosis, especially in less-experienced physicians.
[CONTEXT] It is not clear how to integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based models into diagnostic workflows.
- p-value P < .001
- p-value P = .022
APA
Ha EJ, Lee JH, et al. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Model Assisting Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis and Management: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 109(2), 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad503
MLA
Ha EJ, et al.. "Artificial Intelligence Model Assisting Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis and Management: A Multicenter Diagnostic Study.." The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, vol. 109, no. 2, 2024, pp. 527-535.
PMID
37622451 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[CONTEXT] It is not clear how to integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based models into diagnostic workflows.
[OBJECTIVE] To develop and validate a deep-learning-based AI model (AI-Thyroid) for thyroid cancer diagnosis, and to explore how this improves diagnostic performance.
[METHODS] The system was trained using 19 711 images of 6163 patients in a tertiary hospital (Ajou University Medical Center; AUMC). It was validated using 11 185 images of 4820 patients in 24 hospitals (test set 1) and 4490 images of 2367 patients in AUMC (test set 2). The clinical implications were determined by comparing the findings of six physicians with different levels of experience (group 1: 4 trainees, and group 2: 2 faculty radiologists) before and after AI-Thyroid assistance.
[RESULTS] The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of AI-Thyroid was 0.939. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.922, 87.0%, and 81.5% for test set 1 and 0.938, 89.9%, and 81.6% for test set 2. The AUROCs of AI-Thyroid did not differ significantly according to the prevalence of malignancies (>15.0% vs ≤15.0%, P = .226). In the simulated scenario, AI-Thyroid assistance changed the AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity from 0.854 to 0.945, from 84.2% to 92.7%, and from 72.9% to 86.6% (all P < .001) in group 1, and from 0.914 to 0.939 (P = .022), from 78.6% to 85.5% (P = .053) and from 91.9% to 92.5% (P = .683) in group 2. The interobserver agreement improved from moderate to substantial in both groups.
[CONCLUSION] AI-Thyroid can improve diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in thyroid cancer diagnosis, especially in less-experienced physicians.
[OBJECTIVE] To develop and validate a deep-learning-based AI model (AI-Thyroid) for thyroid cancer diagnosis, and to explore how this improves diagnostic performance.
[METHODS] The system was trained using 19 711 images of 6163 patients in a tertiary hospital (Ajou University Medical Center; AUMC). It was validated using 11 185 images of 4820 patients in 24 hospitals (test set 1) and 4490 images of 2367 patients in AUMC (test set 2). The clinical implications were determined by comparing the findings of six physicians with different levels of experience (group 1: 4 trainees, and group 2: 2 faculty radiologists) before and after AI-Thyroid assistance.
[RESULTS] The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of AI-Thyroid was 0.939. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.922, 87.0%, and 81.5% for test set 1 and 0.938, 89.9%, and 81.6% for test set 2. The AUROCs of AI-Thyroid did not differ significantly according to the prevalence of malignancies (>15.0% vs ≤15.0%, P = .226). In the simulated scenario, AI-Thyroid assistance changed the AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity from 0.854 to 0.945, from 84.2% to 92.7%, and from 72.9% to 86.6% (all P < .001) in group 1, and from 0.914 to 0.939 (P = .022), from 78.6% to 85.5% (P = .053) and from 91.9% to 92.5% (P = .683) in group 2. The interobserver agreement improved from moderate to substantial in both groups.
[CONCLUSION] AI-Thyroid can improve diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in thyroid cancer diagnosis, especially in less-experienced physicians.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
- A Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence Model Assisting Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis and Management: Pilot Results for Evaluating Thyroid Malignancy in Pediatric Cohorts.
- Development of a machine learning-based fine-grained risk stratification system for thyroid nodules using predefined clinicoradiological features.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.