본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancers: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines.

Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) 2024 Vol.39(1) p. 47-60

Kim MJ, Moon JH, Lee EK, Song YS, Jung KY, Lee JY, Kim JH, Kim K, Park SK, Park YJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The indolent nature and favorable outcomes associated with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma have prompted numerous prospective studies on active surveillance (AS) and its adoption as an alternative to

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Kim MJ, Moon JH, et al. (2024). Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancers: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines.. Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), 39(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2024.1937
MLA Kim MJ, et al.. "Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancers: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines.." Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea), vol. 39, no. 1, 2024, pp. 47-60.
PMID 38356210

Abstract

The indolent nature and favorable outcomes associated with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma have prompted numerous prospective studies on active surveillance (AS) and its adoption as an alternative to immediate surgery in managing low-risk thyroid cancer. This article reviews the current status of AS, as outlined in various international practice guidelines. AS is typically recommended for tumors that measure 1 cm or less in diameter and do not exhibit aggressive subtypes on cytology, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, or distant metastasis. To determine the most appropriate candidates for AS, factors such as tumor size, location, multiplicity, and ultrasound findings are considered, along with patient characteristics like medical condition, age, and family history. Moreover, shared decision-making, which includes patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and cost-effectiveness, is essential. During AS, patients undergo regular ultrasound examinations to monitor for signs of disease progression, including tumor growth, extrathyroidal extension, or lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, while AS is a feasible and reliable approach for managing lowrisk thyroid cancer, it requires careful patient selection, effective communication for shared decision-making, standardized follow-up protocols, and a clear definition of disease progression.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Disease Progression; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Thyroid Neoplasms; Thyroidectomy; Watchful Waiting; Practice Guidelines as Topic

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)