본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Survival in Thyroid Cancer in Sweden From 1999 To 2018.

1/5 보강
Clinical epidemiology 2024 Vol.16() p. 659-671
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1 patients was lower than that for M0 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Facilitated treatment pathways have been instituted in Denmark resulting in improved survival. Anaplastic cancer should be a target of a major research focus.

Zitricky F, Koskinen A, Sundquist K, Sundquist J, Liska V, Försti A, Hemminki A, Hemminki K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Thyroid cancer (TC) is diagnosed in several histological types which differ in their clinical characteristics and survival.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Zitricky F, Koskinen A, et al. (2024). Survival in Thyroid Cancer in Sweden From 1999 To 2018.. Clinical epidemiology, 16, 659-671. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S467874
MLA Zitricky F, et al.. "Survival in Thyroid Cancer in Sweden From 1999 To 2018.." Clinical epidemiology, vol. 16, 2024, pp. 659-671.
PMID 39371051

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Thyroid cancer (TC) is diagnosed in several histological types which differ in their clinical characteristics and survival. We aim to describe how they influence TC survival in Sweden.

[METHODS] Cancer data were obtained from the Swedish cancer registry between years 1999 and 2018, and these were used to analyze relative survival.

[RESULTS] Relative survival for all TC improved when analyzed in 10-year periods, and female survival improved more than male survival. Female survival advantage appeared to be present also for specific histological types, although case numbers were low for rare types. Female 5-year relative survival for TC was 100% for follicular, 95.1% for oncocytic, 93.4% for papillary, 89.7% for medullary, and 6.1% for anaplastic cancer. Among the clinical TNM classes, only T4 and M1 stages were associated with decreased survival compared to T1-3 and M0. Anaplastic cancer presented most often at high T and M1 stages, in contrast to other TC. Curiously, the diagnostic age for anaplastic M1 patients was lower than that for M0 patients. Both anaplastic and medullary cancers did not show age-dependent increases in the probability of metastases, in contrast to the main histological types. This could indicate the presence of several types of anaplastic and medullary cancers.

[CONCLUSION] The poor survival for anaplastic TC is an extreme contrast to the excellent survival of differentiated TC. As less than 20% of anaplastic cancer patients survived one year, urgent diagnosis and initiation of treatment are important. Facilitated treatment pathways have been instituted in Denmark resulting in improved survival. Anaplastic cancer should be a target of a major research focus.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)