Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
16 patients (50% female; mean age 50 ± 17 years).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
FAPI and SSTR PET/CT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] FAPI PET presents promising outcomes in detecting metastases in recurrent MTC patients. Although its diagnostic performance matches SSTR on a per-patient basis, FAPI PET exhibits superior sensitivity and accuracy in lesion-based analyses, notably for liver and bone metastases.
[PURPOSE] We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 (FAPI) in comparison to 68Ga-DOTATATE (SSTR) PET/CT for patients presenting with recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
- 표본수 (n) 5
- p-value P = 0.004
APA
Isik EG, Has Simsek D, et al. (2024). Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Cancer.. Clinical nuclear medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005558
MLA
Isik EG, et al.. "Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT in Recurrent Medullary Thyroid Cancer.." Clinical nuclear medicine, 2024.
PMID
39774244 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[PURPOSE] We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 (FAPI) in comparison to 68Ga-DOTATATE (SSTR) PET/CT for patients presenting with recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC).
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Sixteen MTC patients with elevated calcitonin levels (>150 pg/mL) underwent FAPI and SSTR PET/CT. Two nuclear medicine physicians evaluated all images, categorizing lesions into locoregional metastases, mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs), liver, and bone metastases. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio were recorded. PET modalities were compared using the McNemar test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FAPI and SSTR PET were calculated.
[RESULTS] The cohort comprised 16 patients (50% female; mean age 50 ± 17 years). Median calcitonin and CEA levels were 6234 pg/mL and 17.3 ng/mL, respectively. In patient-based analysis, SSTR exhibited higher diagnostic sensitivity compared with FAPI (88% vs 81%), resulting a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004). Mean SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio values were 10.3 and 5.35 for FAPI, and 9.7 and 11.9 for SSTR PET, respectively. In lesion-based analyses, FAPI demonstrated higher accuracy than SSTR for cervical LNs (91.9% vs 50%), mediastinal LNs (94.9% vs 54.4%), and liver metastases (57.4% vs 7.3%), respectively. Notably, 31% of patients (n = 5) with FAP-expressing liver lesions showed no uptake on SSTR imaging. MRI confirmed liver metastases in 3 of these patients; however, 2 FAP-expressing lesions were confirmed as hemangiomas. False-positive findings of DOTA primarily included reactive LNs and bone hemangiomas.
[CONCLUSIONS] FAPI PET presents promising outcomes in detecting metastases in recurrent MTC patients. Although its diagnostic performance matches SSTR on a per-patient basis, FAPI PET exhibits superior sensitivity and accuracy in lesion-based analyses, notably for liver and bone metastases.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Sixteen MTC patients with elevated calcitonin levels (>150 pg/mL) underwent FAPI and SSTR PET/CT. Two nuclear medicine physicians evaluated all images, categorizing lesions into locoregional metastases, mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs), liver, and bone metastases. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio were recorded. PET modalities were compared using the McNemar test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FAPI and SSTR PET were calculated.
[RESULTS] The cohort comprised 16 patients (50% female; mean age 50 ± 17 years). Median calcitonin and CEA levels were 6234 pg/mL and 17.3 ng/mL, respectively. In patient-based analysis, SSTR exhibited higher diagnostic sensitivity compared with FAPI (88% vs 81%), resulting a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004). Mean SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio values were 10.3 and 5.35 for FAPI, and 9.7 and 11.9 for SSTR PET, respectively. In lesion-based analyses, FAPI demonstrated higher accuracy than SSTR for cervical LNs (91.9% vs 50%), mediastinal LNs (94.9% vs 54.4%), and liver metastases (57.4% vs 7.3%), respectively. Notably, 31% of patients (n = 5) with FAP-expressing liver lesions showed no uptake on SSTR imaging. MRI confirmed liver metastases in 3 of these patients; however, 2 FAP-expressing lesions were confirmed as hemangiomas. False-positive findings of DOTA primarily included reactive LNs and bone hemangiomas.
[CONCLUSIONS] FAPI PET presents promising outcomes in detecting metastases in recurrent MTC patients. Although its diagnostic performance matches SSTR on a per-patient basis, FAPI PET exhibits superior sensitivity and accuracy in lesion-based analyses, notably for liver and bone metastases.