본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.

1/5 보강
Endocrine 2025 Vol.87(2) p. 734-743
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
232 patients were included, 91.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
initial I therapy at our tertiary center
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.

Liu Y, Huang S, Li X, Tian T, Huang R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Successful ablation in I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < 0.001
  • p-value P = 0.014
  • 95% CI 9.731-226.699
  • OR 46.968
  • HR 4.765

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Liu Y, Huang S, et al. (2025). Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.. Endocrine, 87(2), 734-743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-024-04064-z
MLA Liu Y, et al.. "Therapeutic efficacies of remnant ablation and radioiodine adjuvant therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer.." Endocrine, vol. 87, no. 2, 2025, pp. 734-743.
PMID 39379773

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Successful ablation in I therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) includes both remnant ablation (RA) and radioiodine adjuvant therapy (RAT). This study aimed to differentiate between the therapeutic efficacies of RA and RAT, investigate the factors associated with their effectiveness, and assess their impact on prognosis.

[METHODS] This retrospective study included patients with DTC who underwent initial I therapy at our tertiary center. The successful RA (SRA) and successful RAT (SRAT) was determined based on the I-diagnostic whole-body scan (Dx-WBS), TSH-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels, and neck ultrasound at the 6th month after I therapy. The patients were divided into complete response and persistent/recurrent disease groups during the follow-up period.

[RESULTS] A total of 232 patients were included, 91.8% (213/232) of patients achieved SRA, only 8.1% (19/232) failed RA (FRA). Among the 213 patients in the SRA group, 70.4% (150/213) achieved SRAT and 29.6% (63/213) failed RAT (FRAT). Only pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (OR = 46.968, 95% CI 9.731-226.699, P < 0.001) was an independent risk factor predicting the failure of RAT. The prognostic analysis included 215 patients, and 6.1% (13/215) were classified as persistent/recurrent disease at the last follow-up. Both pre-ablation sTg >10 ng/mL (HR = 4.765, 95% CI 1.371-16.566, P = 0.014) and FRAT (HR = 10.104, 95% CI 1.071-95.304, P = 0.043) independently predicted persistent/recurrent disease.

[CONCLUSIONS] RA is easy to achieve successfully, whereas RAT evaluation provides greater value than RA for prognosis prediction. For patients with low Tg levels and no imaging evidence of disease, routine Dx-WBS during follow-up has minimal significance.

MeSH Terms

Thyroid Neoplasms; Iodine Radioisotopes; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Young Adult; Thyroglobulin; Adolescent; Prognosis; Thyroidectomy

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)