본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluation of Changes in Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.

1/5 보강
Journal of clinical medicine 2025 Vol.14(5)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
892 patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer between 2001 and 2020, with 39,265 patients in Cohort 1 and 55,627 in Cohort 2.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
we found significant differences between the two cohorts.

Doğan Ö, Ahmed MA, Ekinci ÖB, Yıldız A, Dogan I

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

In this study, we evaluated the changes in clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with thyroid cancer in the last two decades using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Data

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • HR 0.78

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Doğan Ö, Ahmed MA, et al. (2025). Evaluation of Changes in Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.. Journal of clinical medicine, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051482
MLA Doğan Ö, et al.. "Evaluation of Changes in Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.." Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 14, no. 5, 2025.
PMID 40094945
DOI 10.3390/jcm14051482

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the changes in clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with thyroid cancer in the last two decades using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database (SEER) data. Data from the SEER-12 registry (1992-2021) were analyzed, focusing on patients diagnosed with malignant thyroid cancer between 2001 and 2020. The study population was divided into Cohort 1 (2001-2010) and Cohort 2 (2011-2020). Cohorts 1 and 2 were compared regarding clinicopathological features and prognosis. The study included 94,892 patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer between 2001 and 2020, with 39,265 patients in Cohort 1 and 55,627 in Cohort 2. Compared to Cohort 1, in Cohort 2 showed a statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients aged 60+ (+4.2%), male patients (+2.1%), and cases of papillary cancer (+5.3%) and regional disease (+3.7%) (all < 0.001). Although Cohort 2 demonstrated an 8% improvement in survival compared to Cohort 1, this result was not statistically significant ( = 0.057). Prognostic factors were identified, such as disease stage at diagnosis, age, gender, and origin. Among pathological subtypes, the patients with papillary + FV had the best prognosis (HR: 0.78), compared to patients in the other group, mainly comprising anaplastic tumors and sarcomas, which had the worst prognosis (HR: 9.61). In this large-scale study of thyroid cancer patients, we found significant differences between the two cohorts. In Cohort 2, the proportion of patients aged ≥60 years, male, and with papillary thyroid cancer was increased. We found that age, sex, origin, histopathological subtype, and stage at diagnosis were prognostic factors in patients with thyroid cancer. Also, we observed a trend toward improved survival in Cohort 2.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)