본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Combining Procalcitonin and Calcitonin for the Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Two-Step Approach.

1/5 보강
Clinical endocrinology 📖 저널 OA 19.4% 2025 Vol.103(4) p. 587-595
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
478 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in Padua between January 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled to investigate ProCT levels in comparison with CT for MTC diagnosis.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] CT is more sensitive than ProCT as a diagnostic marker for MTC. However, a two-step approach using ProCT as a supplementary marker can help to refine the diagnosis avoiding overtreatment, particularly when CT serum levels lie between 10 and 100 pg/mL.

Clausi C, Censi S, Zanin E, Messina G, Piva I, Basso D, Merante Boschin I, Bertazza L, Torresan F, Iacobone M, Battheu F, Barollo S, Arnone JM, Mian C

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] Calcitonin (CT) represents the most important biochemical marker of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), but has certain limits.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Clausi C, Censi S, et al. (2025). Combining Procalcitonin and Calcitonin for the Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Two-Step Approach.. Clinical endocrinology, 103(4), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15287
MLA Clausi C, et al.. "Combining Procalcitonin and Calcitonin for the Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Two-Step Approach.." Clinical endocrinology, vol. 103, no. 4, 2025, pp. 587-595.
PMID 40464083
DOI 10.1111/cen.15287

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] Calcitonin (CT) represents the most important biochemical marker of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC), but has certain limits. Procalcitonin (ProCT) has been recognized as an alternative or additional marker for MTC. The aim of the study is to evaluate prospectively the role of ProCT combined with CT in the identification of MTC.

[DESIGN] Patients and measurements: 478 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in Padua between January 2023 and June 2024 were enrolled to investigate ProCT levels in comparison with CT for MTC diagnosis. Serum levels of ProCT and CT were dosed preoperatively.

[RESULTS] At histological diagnosis, 23/478 (4.8%) patients tested positive for MTC. CT with a cut-off > 10 pg/mL performed as follows: sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.98, positive predictive value (PPV) 0.7, negative predictive value (NPV) 0.99. CT with a cut-off > 10 pg/mL performed better than ProCT both using the cut-off of 0.04 ng/mL (sensitivity 0.87; specificity 0.96; PPV 0.56; NPV 0.99) and the cut-off of 0.07 ng/mL (sensitivity 0.78; specificity 0.98; PPV 0.72; NPV 0.99). Within the sample of patients with a CT value between 10 and 100 pg/mL, 17/21 (80.9%) patients would have been correctly identified as MTC or non-MTC based on a positive or negative ProCT using the 0.04 ng/mL cut-off.

[CONCLUSIONS] CT is more sensitive than ProCT as a diagnostic marker for MTC. However, a two-step approach using ProCT as a supplementary marker can help to refine the diagnosis avoiding overtreatment, particularly when CT serum levels lie between 10 and 100 pg/mL.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

🟢 PMC 전문 열기