본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Active surveillance in thyroid cancer: a paradigm shift requiring critical appraisal and caution.

1/5 보강
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 📖 저널 OA 35.5% 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in the 2025 American Thyroid Association guidelines represents a potential paradigm shift in clinical management
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
We also compare the evidence supporting AS in DTC with that available for other malignancies, underscoring the current lack of robust prospective data. We argue that, until stronger evidence becomes available, AS in DTC should be applied with caution and within a well-defined multidisciplinary framework, ensuring transparent communication with patients regarding uncertainties and potential risks.

Trimboli P, Piccardo A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

The recent inclusion of active surveillance (AS) for selected patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in the 2025 American Thyroid Association guidelines represents a potential paradigm shif

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Trimboli P, Piccardo A (2026). Active surveillance in thyroid cancer: a paradigm shift requiring critical appraisal and caution.. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-026-07872-9
MLA Trimboli P, et al.. "Active surveillance in thyroid cancer: a paradigm shift requiring critical appraisal and caution.." European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026.
PMID 41915039

Abstract

The recent inclusion of active surveillance (AS) for selected patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in the 2025 American Thyroid Association guidelines represents a potential paradigm shift in clinical management. While AS has gained acceptance in other oncologic settings, its application to DTC raises several unresolved conceptual and practical issues. In this Letter, we critically appraise the definition, indications, and monitoring strategies proposed for AS in DTC, highlighting limitations related to preoperative risk stratification, imaging accuracy, and follow-up standardization. Particular attention is given to the implications for nuclear medicine practice and multidisciplinary decision-making. We also compare the evidence supporting AS in DTC with that available for other malignancies, underscoring the current lack of robust prospective data. We argue that, until stronger evidence becomes available, AS in DTC should be applied with caution and within a well-defined multidisciplinary framework, ensuring transparent communication with patients regarding uncertainties and potential risks.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)