Radiological progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A bivariate meta-analysis.
메타분석
1/5 보강
[BACKGROUND] Overall survival (OS) is the standard efficacy endpoint in various solid tumor trials; however, it requires longer follow-up time for assessment than potential intermediate endpoints.
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Shore N, Morgans AK, et al. (2025). Radiological progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A bivariate meta-analysis.. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 223, 115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115513
MLA
Shore N, et al.. "Radiological progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A bivariate meta-analysis.." European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), vol. 223, 2025, pp. 115513.
PMID
40413878 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Overall survival (OS) is the standard efficacy endpoint in various solid tumor trials; however, it requires longer follow-up time for assessment than potential intermediate endpoints. This study evaluated radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) as a surrogate for OS in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) using aggregate-level data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
[METHODS] A systematic literature review identified mHSPC RCTs published through December 2023, reporting hazard ratios for rPFS (HR) and OS (HR). Correlation between HR and HR was assessed using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA). Predictive validity was assessed with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The surrogate threshold effect (STE), or minimum rPFS benefit predicting an OS benefit, was estimated using recent mHSPC trial sample sizes. Sensitivity analyses (1) omitted trials that had only one of the endpoints reported, (2) omitted HRs that violated proportional hazards assumptions, (3) omitted trials that allowed cross-over and (4) investigated different assumed values of the within-study correlation.
[RESULTS] The primary analysis included 35 treatment comparisons from 31 trials. The estimated rPFS-OS correlation was 0.95 (95 % CrI: 0.75, 1.00). LOOCV confirmed HR were within 95 % prediction intervals. The estimated STE ranged from 0.55 to 0.71 depending on the trial size being predicted. Sensitivity analyses produced strong but slightly lower correlations (0.87, 0.89, 0.91) than the primary analysis, with full coverage of the reported HR in cross validation. Increasing within-study correlation slightly reduced between-study correlation.
[CONCLUSIONS] The derived surrogacy equation enables OS estimation based on reported rPFS benefits in mHSPC, meeting NICE's 95 % surrogate validity threshold. These findings support rPFS as a reliable surrogate for OS, facilitating prediction of OS benefits in future mHSPC trials.
[METHODS] A systematic literature review identified mHSPC RCTs published through December 2023, reporting hazard ratios for rPFS (HR) and OS (HR). Correlation between HR and HR was assessed using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA). Predictive validity was assessed with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The surrogate threshold effect (STE), or minimum rPFS benefit predicting an OS benefit, was estimated using recent mHSPC trial sample sizes. Sensitivity analyses (1) omitted trials that had only one of the endpoints reported, (2) omitted HRs that violated proportional hazards assumptions, (3) omitted trials that allowed cross-over and (4) investigated different assumed values of the within-study correlation.
[RESULTS] The primary analysis included 35 treatment comparisons from 31 trials. The estimated rPFS-OS correlation was 0.95 (95 % CrI: 0.75, 1.00). LOOCV confirmed HR were within 95 % prediction intervals. The estimated STE ranged from 0.55 to 0.71 depending on the trial size being predicted. Sensitivity analyses produced strong but slightly lower correlations (0.87, 0.89, 0.91) than the primary analysis, with full coverage of the reported HR in cross validation. Increasing within-study correlation slightly reduced between-study correlation.
[CONCLUSIONS] The derived surrogacy equation enables OS estimation based on reported rPFS benefits in mHSPC, meeting NICE's 95 % surrogate validity threshold. These findings support rPFS as a reliable surrogate for OS, facilitating prediction of OS benefits in future mHSPC trials.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Editorial Comment on "Homologous Recombination Repair Mutations, Next-generation Sequencing Testing, and Treatment Progression by Race Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer".
- Population-adjusted network meta-analyses provide new insights into the efficacy of treatment alternatives for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.
- Impact of a rash management guide in patients receiving apalutamide for high-risk localized prostate cancer in the Apa-RP study.
- Implementation of Universal Germline Genetic Testing Into Standard of Care for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Time Is Now.
- Efficacy and safety of treatments for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A comprehensive network meta-analysis including final ARANOTE data.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.