Utility of tumor diameter-to-prostate volume ratio for predicting the outcome of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
565 patients were analyzed; the AUC of TD/PV was significantly superior to those of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor diameter, PSA density, and PI-RADS for predicting PCa (AUC: 0.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy for PI-RADS version 2
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The predictive nomograms combining TD/PV and PI-RADS category were constructed and their AUCs for predicting PCa and csPCa were 0.861 and 0.845, respectively. [CONCLUSIONS] In this retrospective analysis, prediction of PCa and csPCa on MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy was improved when TD/PV was combined with PI-RADS category.
[OBJECTIVES] To assess the impact of the tumor diameter-to-prostate volume ratio (TD/PV) on predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs) -PCa in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) /t
- p-value P < 0.05
APA
Kohada Y, Miyamoto S, et al. (2025). Utility of tumor diameter-to-prostate volume ratio for predicting the outcome of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy.. Urologic oncology, 43(7), 444.e11-444.e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.021
MLA
Kohada Y, et al.. "Utility of tumor diameter-to-prostate volume ratio for predicting the outcome of magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy.." Urologic oncology, vol. 43, no. 7, 2025, pp. 444.e11-444.e20.
PMID
40234138 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVES] To assess the impact of the tumor diameter-to-prostate volume ratio (TD/PV) on predicting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs) -PCa in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) /transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-targeted biopsy based on prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) findings in MRI.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients who underwent MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy for PI-RADS version 2.1 categories 3-5 lesions between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. TD/PV was calculated by dividing the tumor diameter by the total prostate volume. csPCa was defined as a Gleason score of ≥ 3 + 4. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop predictive nomograms for PCa and csPCa. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate the predictive ability of the factors using the area under the curve (AUC).
[RESULTS] A total of 565 patients were analyzed; the AUC of TD/PV was significantly superior to those of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor diameter, PSA density, and PI-RADS for predicting PCa (AUC: 0.840, P < 0.05) and csPCa (AUC: 0.819, P < 0.05). Multivariable analyses showed that TD/PV is a significant predictive factor for PCa and csPCa in MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy (P < 0.05). The predictive nomograms combining TD/PV and PI-RADS category were constructed and their AUCs for predicting PCa and csPCa were 0.861 and 0.845, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this retrospective analysis, prediction of PCa and csPCa on MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy was improved when TD/PV was combined with PI-RADS category.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients who underwent MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy for PI-RADS version 2.1 categories 3-5 lesions between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. TD/PV was calculated by dividing the tumor diameter by the total prostate volume. csPCa was defined as a Gleason score of ≥ 3 + 4. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop predictive nomograms for PCa and csPCa. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to evaluate the predictive ability of the factors using the area under the curve (AUC).
[RESULTS] A total of 565 patients were analyzed; the AUC of TD/PV was significantly superior to those of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), tumor diameter, PSA density, and PI-RADS for predicting PCa (AUC: 0.840, P < 0.05) and csPCa (AUC: 0.819, P < 0.05). Multivariable analyses showed that TD/PV is a significant predictive factor for PCa and csPCa in MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy (P < 0.05). The predictive nomograms combining TD/PV and PI-RADS category were constructed and their AUCs for predicting PCa and csPCa were 0.861 and 0.845, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] In this retrospective analysis, prediction of PCa and csPCa on MRI/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy was improved when TD/PV was combined with PI-RADS category.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.