본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.

1/5 보강
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2025 Vol.35(7) p. 542-549
Retraction 확인
출처

Santarelli V, Valenzi FM, Aljoulani M, Haberal HB, Morgantini LA, Biasatti A, Salciccia S, Di Pierro GB, Franco G, Autorino R, Crivellaro S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Santarelli V, Valenzi FM, et al. (2025). Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.. Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, 35(7), 542-549. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0055
MLA Santarelli V, et al.. "Learning Curve of Single-Port Robotic-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A CUSUM-Based Analysis.." Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A, vol. 35, no. 7, 2025, pp. 542-549.
PMID 40372956

Abstract

Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) has been demonstrated to be a feasible and safe procedure. Nonetheless, the challenges of SP surgery could limit the transferability of skills from multi-port (MP) console. The aim of our study was to assess the learning curve of SP-RARP. SP-RARPs performed by a single experienced surgeon were reviewed. The surgical learning curve was assessed using risk-adjusted cumulative summation (CUSUM) methodology in terms of operative time, separately for SP-RARPs with pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) and without PLND. 119 extraperitoneal SP-RARPs were evaluated, 83 with PLND and 36 without PLND. After CUSUM calculation, a cubic polynomial regression was performed to plot the learning curves. The inflection points, representing the number of cases required to achieve proficiency, corresponded to the 42 and 20 procedure, respectively, for SP-RARP with and without PLND. The learning curves were subsequently divided into a learning phase and a proficiency phase to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the two phases. In both groups, cases in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower median operative times ( = .01 and < .001) and hospital stays ( = .015 and = .04). In the SP-RARP without the PLND group, patients in the proficiency phase demonstrated significantly lower postoperative pain scores ( = .04). No differences were found in terms of estimated blood loss, complication rates, and positive surgical margin rates ( > .05). Results from our analysis suggest that the learning curve of extraperitoneal SP-RARP is not longer than that reported for MP-RARP. Moreover, when cautiously approached, the learning process can be undertaken without compromising safety and oncological outcomes.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Learning Curve; Prostatectomy; Male; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Aged; Lymph Node Excision; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Length of Stay; Clinical Competence

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)