본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Disparities in tissue-based biomarker testing among US Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer.

1/5 보강
JNCI cancer spectrum 2025 Vol.9(4)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
202 patients, of whom 79.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
tissue-based biomarker tests
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Further, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive testing. Our findings highlight regional practice variation in the use of advanced, not routinely recommended tests and underscore the need to minimize disparities in diagnostic access.

Korn SM, Qian Z, Zurl H, Piccolini A, Pohl KK, Lipsitz S, Zhang J, Kibel AS, Moore CM, Rana HQ, Kilbridge KL, Shariat SF, Loeb S, Trinh QD, Cole AP

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Personalized therapeutic approaches for localized prostate cancer have evolved significantly, with tissue-based biomarker tests supplementing traditional risk stratification tools.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Korn SM, Qian Z, et al. (2025). Disparities in tissue-based biomarker testing among US Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer.. JNCI cancer spectrum, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf051
MLA Korn SM, et al.. "Disparities in tissue-based biomarker testing among US Medicare beneficiaries with prostate cancer.." JNCI cancer spectrum, vol. 9, no. 4, 2025.
PMID 40378235

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Personalized therapeutic approaches for localized prostate cancer have evolved significantly, with tissue-based biomarker tests supplementing traditional risk stratification tools. However, national testing patterns and geographic variability remain limited a decade after coverage implementation. We aimed to assess current nationwide utilization and urban-rural differences in tissue-based biomarker testing.

[METHODS] Using full Medicare claims data, we retrospectively identified patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and tissue-based biomarker testing claims from 2019 to 2023. Patients' county of residence was categorized as metro, urban, or rural. Regional testing rates were further assessed across hospital referral regions. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess the effect of residence on test receipt.

[RESULTS] Our final cohort included 749 202 patients, of whom 79.5% lived in metro, 11.4% in urban and 8.00% in rural counties. Overall, 86 908 (11.6%) patients underwent tissue-based biomarker tests. Hospital referral region-level testing rates ranged from 2.4% to 42.7%. Rural patients were 18% less likely to undergo testing compared to metro patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.91). Independently, the odds of undergoing testing were lower among Black (OR 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77 to 0.88) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.80, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.88) compared to White patients.

[CONCLUSION] This study reveals high geographic variability in tissue-based biomarker testing for prostate cancer. Further, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive testing. Our findings highlight regional practice variation in the use of advanced, not routinely recommended tests and underscore the need to minimize disparities in diagnostic access.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; United States; Medicare; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Biomarkers, Tumor; Healthcare Disparities; Rural Population; Urban Population; Aged, 80 and over; Black or African American; White

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)