본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Deep Learning Model Integrating Clinical and MRI Features Improves Risk Stratification and Reduces Unnecessary Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

1/5 보강
Cancers 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 20/20 OA 2022: 79/79 OA 2023: 89/89 OA 2024: 156/156 OA 2025: 683/683 OA 2026: 512/512 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.17(13)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
MRI and biopsy between April 2019-September 2024
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Model 3 improved csPCa risk stratification, particularly in biopsy-averse settings, while Model 2 was more effective in cancer-averse scenarios. These models support personalized, context-sensitive biopsy decisions.

Bacchetti E, De Nardin A, Giannarini G, Cereser L, Zuiani C, Crestani A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Accurate upfront risk stratification in suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Bacchetti E, De Nardin A, et al. (2025). A Deep Learning Model Integrating Clinical and MRI Features Improves Risk Stratification and Reduces Unnecessary Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.. Cancers, 17(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132257
MLA Bacchetti E, et al.. "A Deep Learning Model Integrating Clinical and MRI Features Improves Risk Stratification and Reduces Unnecessary Biopsies in Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer.." Cancers, vol. 17, no. 13, 2025.
PMID 40647554 ↗

Abstract

Accurate upfront risk stratification in suspected clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) may reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Integrating clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) variables using deep learning could improve prediction. We retrospectively analysed 538 men who underwent MRI and biopsy between April 2019-September 2024. A fully connected neural network was trained using 5-fold cross-validation. Model 1 included clinical features (age, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], PSA density, digital rectal examination, family history, prior negative biopsy, and ongoing therapy). Model 2 used MRI-derived Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categories. Model 3 used all previous variables as well as lesion size, location, and prostate volume as determined on MRI. Model 3 achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC = 0.822), followed by Model 2 (AUC = 0.778) and Model 1 (AUC = 0.716). Sensitivities for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were 87.4%, 91.6%, and 86.8% for Models 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Although Model 3 had slightly lower sensitivity than Model 2, it showed higher specificity, reducing false positives and avoiding 43.4% and 21.2% more biopsies compared to Models 1 and 2. Decision curve analysis showed M2 had the highest net benefit at risk thresholds ≤ 20%, while M3 was superior above 20%. Model 3 improved csPCa risk stratification, particularly in biopsy-averse settings, while Model 2 was more effective in cancer-averse scenarios. These models support personalized, context-sensitive biopsy decisions.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기