Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Case Series with Cost Analysis.
증례연속
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
45 patients were included in the study with focal therapy ranging from 2023 to 2025 (4 HIFU, 20 cryoablation, 21 IRE).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
HIFU, cryoablation, or IRE for localized PCa were retrospectively reviewed, excluding patients who received whole-gland therapy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Cost analysis in contemporary publications is lacking. Although follow-up was short, cancer control was adequate.
Focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) provides approaches to treat PCa patients in a less invasive manner than traditional whole-gland surgical or radiation modalities.
- 추적기간 6 months
APA
Sandberg M, Thole D, et al. (2025). Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Case Series with Cost Analysis.. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 32(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32090476
MLA
Sandberg M, et al.. "Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Case Series with Cost Analysis.." Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), vol. 32, no. 9, 2025.
PMID
41002546
Abstract
Focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) provides approaches to treat PCa patients in a less invasive manner than traditional whole-gland surgical or radiation modalities. This manuscript provides a case series of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), cryoablation, and irreversible electroporation (IRE) for PCa at a single institution and cost analysis with a review of the literature. All patients who underwent HIFU, cryoablation, or IRE for localized PCa were retrospectively reviewed, excluding patients who received whole-gland therapy. Functional outcomes were erectile dysfunction and lower urinary tract symptoms. Cost data were collected. A total of 45 patients were included in the study with focal therapy ranging from 2023 to 2025 (4 HIFU, 20 cryoablation, 21 IRE). A total of 30 patients had focally treated lesions, and 15 patients had hemi-gland treatment. The mean preoperative PSA was 7.7 ng/mL. On the paired sample t-test, there was no significant difference between pre-focal and post-focal therapy PSA. Three patients experienced biochemical recurrence requiring prostate biopsy after focal treatment. Mean cost was USD 3804.50 and not significantly different by focal treatment. No metastatic events occurred nor deaths at a median follow-up of 6 months. Patients in this series had largely unaltered functional outcomes. Cost analysis in contemporary publications is lacking. Although follow-up was short, cancer control was adequate.