Comparing the safety and efficacy of systemic therapies for high-risk biochemically recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: prostate-specific antigen <0
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Treatment-related adverse events were least common for androgen-deprivation therapy alone. [DISCUSSION] This network meta-analysis provides evidence that enzalutamide combination therapy provides considerable oncological benefit in high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, albeit with a higher risk of treatment-related adverse events.
[INTRODUCTION] Enzalutamide is the only androgen receptor pathway inhibitor approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency to treat high-risk biochemicall
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Aprikian A, Chilelli A, et al. (2025). Comparing the safety and efficacy of systemic therapies for high-risk biochemically recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.. Frontiers in oncology, 15, 1638405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1638405
MLA
Aprikian A, et al.. "Comparing the safety and efficacy of systemic therapies for high-risk biochemically recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis.." Frontiers in oncology, vol. 15, 2025, pp. 1638405.
PMID
40951348 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[INTRODUCTION] Enzalutamide is the only androgen receptor pathway inhibitor approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency to treat high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The objective of this network meta-analysis was to provide indirect evidence of the efficacy of enzalutamide relative to other therapies for biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We conducted a systematic literature review to identify trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of current and emerging interventions. Outcomes of interest were metastasis-free survival, overall survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, time to castration resistance, proportion of patients with prostate-specific antigen <0.2 ng/ml at 36 (± 4) weeks of treatment, and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Fixed- and random-effects models were run under the Bayesian framework.
[RESULTS] Enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (i.e., combination therapy) demonstrated superiority over most comparators for overall survival (except androgen-deprivation therapy + docetaxel, which was similar), and over all comparators for metastasis-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and time to castration resistance. Enzalutamide combination therapy demonstrated superiority over enzalutamide monotherapy for all efficacy outcomes, and similar performance for safety. Enzalutamide monotherapy demonstrated superiority over androgen-deprivation therapy alone and androgen-deprivation therapy + docetaxel for metastasis-free survival and time to prostate-specific antigen progression. Treatment-related adverse events were least common for androgen-deprivation therapy alone.
[DISCUSSION] This network meta-analysis provides evidence that enzalutamide combination therapy provides considerable oncological benefit in high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, albeit with a higher risk of treatment-related adverse events.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We conducted a systematic literature review to identify trials that assessed the efficacy and safety of current and emerging interventions. Outcomes of interest were metastasis-free survival, overall survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, time to castration resistance, proportion of patients with prostate-specific antigen <0.2 ng/ml at 36 (± 4) weeks of treatment, and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events. Fixed- and random-effects models were run under the Bayesian framework.
[RESULTS] Enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (i.e., combination therapy) demonstrated superiority over most comparators for overall survival (except androgen-deprivation therapy + docetaxel, which was similar), and over all comparators for metastasis-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, and time to castration resistance. Enzalutamide combination therapy demonstrated superiority over enzalutamide monotherapy for all efficacy outcomes, and similar performance for safety. Enzalutamide monotherapy demonstrated superiority over androgen-deprivation therapy alone and androgen-deprivation therapy + docetaxel for metastasis-free survival and time to prostate-specific antigen progression. Treatment-related adverse events were least common for androgen-deprivation therapy alone.
[DISCUSSION] This network meta-analysis provides evidence that enzalutamide combination therapy provides considerable oncological benefit in high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, albeit with a higher risk of treatment-related adverse events.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Comparative Detection Performance of PSMA and Non-PSMA PET Tracers in Recurrent and Primary Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
- A novel prognostic signature based on mitochondrial permeability transition-driven necrosis genes for biochemical recurrence prediction in prostate cancer.
- Loss of UFL1 confers enzalutamide resistance of prostate tumors by regulating METTL16-mediated m6A modification of EEF1A1 mRNA.
- Long-Term Oncological Outcomes in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Who Are Able to Maintain/Recover Ongoing Anticancer Therapy After SARS-CoV-2 Infection-Results of the MEET-URO 22 Study.
- Incidence and oncologic outcomes of patients with prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy.
- Adherence to post-therapeutic multidisciplinary tumor board recommendation and its influence on oncological outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy.