Real-world outcomes following biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy with a short prostate-specific antigen doubling time: potential role of early secondary treatment.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
781 patients with BCR were identified (502 rapid; 279 less rapid PSADT).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
secondary treatment within 1 year after BCR
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
More contemporary patients treated with early secondary treatment had better outcomes than historical data from patients who had delayed treatment. Whether these results reflect the benefits of early secondary treatment or overall improvements in prostate cancer outcomes over time requires further study.
[BACKGROUND] The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) managed with delayed hormonal therapy is well documented by data from Johns Hopkins.
APA
Freedland SJ, Gao W, et al. (2025). Real-world outcomes following biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy with a short prostate-specific antigen doubling time: potential role of early secondary treatment.. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 28(3), 809-816. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00894-0
MLA
Freedland SJ, et al.. "Real-world outcomes following biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy with a short prostate-specific antigen doubling time: potential role of early secondary treatment.." Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, vol. 28, no. 3, 2025, pp. 809-816.
PMID
39271770
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) managed with delayed hormonal therapy is well documented by data from Johns Hopkins. However, as many patients receive treatment prior to metastasis, we evaluated the natural history and role of prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) in a more contemporary cohort of BCR patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC).
[METHODS] Patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 01/01/06 to 06/22/20) with nmCSPC and BCR were divided into rapid ( ≤9 months) and less rapid ( >9 to ≤15 months) PSADT cohorts. Patients with PSADT >15 months were excluded as outcomes, even with delayed treatment, are excellent. Outcomes included time to first antineoplastic therapy after BCR, metastasis, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox models adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics.
[RESULTS] Overall, 781 patients with BCR were identified (502 rapid; 279 less rapid PSADT). Rapid PSADT was associated with shorter time to first systemic antineoplastic therapy (median 11.4 vs. 28.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.17 [1.83-2.57]), metastasis (102.4 months vs. not reached, 1.79 [1.33-2.40]), MFS (76.1 vs. 106.3 months, 1.73 [1.33-2.24]), and OS (120.5 vs. 140.5 months, 1.76 [1.22-2.54]) versus less rapid PSADT.
[CONCLUSION] Most patients with rapid PSADT underwent secondary treatment within 1 year after BCR. More contemporary patients treated with early secondary treatment had better outcomes than historical data from patients who had delayed treatment. Whether these results reflect the benefits of early secondary treatment or overall improvements in prostate cancer outcomes over time requires further study.
[METHODS] Patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 01/01/06 to 06/22/20) with nmCSPC and BCR were divided into rapid ( ≤9 months) and less rapid ( >9 to ≤15 months) PSADT cohorts. Patients with PSADT >15 months were excluded as outcomes, even with delayed treatment, are excellent. Outcomes included time to first antineoplastic therapy after BCR, metastasis, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox models adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics.
[RESULTS] Overall, 781 patients with BCR were identified (502 rapid; 279 less rapid PSADT). Rapid PSADT was associated with shorter time to first systemic antineoplastic therapy (median 11.4 vs. 28.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.17 [1.83-2.57]), metastasis (102.4 months vs. not reached, 1.79 [1.33-2.40]), MFS (76.1 vs. 106.3 months, 1.73 [1.33-2.24]), and OS (120.5 vs. 140.5 months, 1.76 [1.22-2.54]) versus less rapid PSADT.
[CONCLUSION] Most patients with rapid PSADT underwent secondary treatment within 1 year after BCR. More contemporary patients treated with early secondary treatment had better outcomes than historical data from patients who had delayed treatment. Whether these results reflect the benefits of early secondary treatment or overall improvements in prostate cancer outcomes over time requires further study.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
- Survival benefit associated with first-line androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.
- Impact of treatment suspension on health-related quality of life in the EMBARK trial: a post hoc analysis.
- Retrospective Analysis of Racial Differences in Treatment Patterns and Prostate-Specific Antigen Responses Among Patients with Prostate Cancer Treated with Relugolix in the Veterans Health Administration.