Patterns of telehealth use in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
236 patients with localized prostate cancer.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Telehealth adoption was associated with year of index biopsy, numerous patient factors, and residing in a large metropolitan area. This work helps clarify geographic patterns of implementation and factors associated with access to telehealth prostate cancer care since COVID-19, which is timely given upcoming legislative decisions to be made surrounding continued coverage flexibilities.
[OBJECTIVES] To characterize the use of Telehealth in prostate cancer management at a national-level in the United States.
APA
Eyrich NW, Patil D, et al. (2025). Patterns of telehealth use in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.. Urologic oncology, 43(9), 526.e1-526.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.028
MLA
Eyrich NW, et al.. "Patterns of telehealth use in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.." Urologic oncology, vol. 43, no. 9, 2025, pp. 526.e1-526.e8.
PMID
40355309 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVES] To characterize the use of Telehealth in prostate cancer management at a national-level in the United States.
[METHODS] We used a population-level database (MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Database, Merative, Ann Arbor, MI) of prostate cancer patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2017 through 2022 with commercial or Medicare coverage to evaluate variation in telehealth use based on patient factors and place of residence (defined by metropolitan statistical area).
[RESULTS] We identified 33,236 patients with localized prostate cancer. About 8,574 men (25.8%) had any telehealth usage in the 6 months before or 12 months after diagnosis. 5,483 (16.5%) patients had ≥1 cancer-specific telehealth visit within 12 months after diagnosis. Of these, 4,896 patients (89.3%) reside in a metropolitan statistical area. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger vs. older patients, health plan, residing in a metropolitan statistical area, living outside of the Southern US, and year of index biopsy were significantly associated with the receipt of prostate cancer-related telehealth. Telehealth use remarkably increased in early 2020 with decline in late 2020 then remained stably above pre-COVID levels throughout 2021 to 2022.
[CONCLUSIONS] We report the first analysis of telehealth use by men with localized prostate cancer nationwide. Telehealth adoption was associated with year of index biopsy, numerous patient factors, and residing in a large metropolitan area. This work helps clarify geographic patterns of implementation and factors associated with access to telehealth prostate cancer care since COVID-19, which is timely given upcoming legislative decisions to be made surrounding continued coverage flexibilities.
[METHODS] We used a population-level database (MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Database, Merative, Ann Arbor, MI) of prostate cancer patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2017 through 2022 with commercial or Medicare coverage to evaluate variation in telehealth use based on patient factors and place of residence (defined by metropolitan statistical area).
[RESULTS] We identified 33,236 patients with localized prostate cancer. About 8,574 men (25.8%) had any telehealth usage in the 6 months before or 12 months after diagnosis. 5,483 (16.5%) patients had ≥1 cancer-specific telehealth visit within 12 months after diagnosis. Of these, 4,896 patients (89.3%) reside in a metropolitan statistical area. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger vs. older patients, health plan, residing in a metropolitan statistical area, living outside of the Southern US, and year of index biopsy were significantly associated with the receipt of prostate cancer-related telehealth. Telehealth use remarkably increased in early 2020 with decline in late 2020 then remained stably above pre-COVID levels throughout 2021 to 2022.
[CONCLUSIONS] We report the first analysis of telehealth use by men with localized prostate cancer nationwide. Telehealth adoption was associated with year of index biopsy, numerous patient factors, and residing in a large metropolitan area. This work helps clarify geographic patterns of implementation and factors associated with access to telehealth prostate cancer care since COVID-19, which is timely given upcoming legislative decisions to be made surrounding continued coverage flexibilities.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.