본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.

1/5 보강
ANZ journal of surgery 📖 저널 OA 28.1% 2021: 1/14 OA 2022: 3/13 OA 2023: 5/13 OA 2024: 3/8 OA 2025: 19/40 OA 2026: 13/35 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.95(9) p. 1906-1911
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
biopsy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.

Williams N, Remmers S, Jay A, Santoro K, O'Callaghan M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Williams N, Remmers S, et al. (2025). External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.. ANZ journal of surgery, 95(9), 1906-1911. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70211
MLA Williams N, et al.. "External Validation of MRI-Based Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators in an Australian Cohort.." ANZ journal of surgery, vol. 95, no. 9, 2025, pp. 1906-1911.
PMID 40576274 ↗
DOI 10.1111/ans.70211

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To validate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based prostate cancer risk calculators in an Australian population.

[METHODS] Data was retrospectively collected from patients biopsied at SALHN from May 2018 to March 2023. Men with MRI-suspicious lesions underwent biopsy. Performance of nine risk calculators was evaluated by discrimination, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration, and recalibration. Subgroup analysis of biopsy-naïve patients was conducted.

[RESULTS] Fifty-two percent had clinically significant cancer (International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] Grade Group ≥ 2). Median age of 67 years (IQR 62-67), PSA 7.3 ng/mL (IQR 5.3-11) and prostate volume 45 mL (IQR 32 mL-67 mL) were observed. Abnormal DRE was recorded in 47%, and in 65% a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) score of > 4 was observed. The RPCRC and Mehralivand risk calculators demonstrated the best performance, with the Radtke risk calculator demonstrating adequate performance in the biopsy naïve subgroup analysis. DCA demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12% of biopsies at a 15% risk threshold prior to recalibration. With recalibration, a net benefit of up to 6% at a 15% risk threshold was demonstrated. Analyses demonstrated a net benefit of up to 12.5% both pre and post recalibration in biopsy naïve patients. Discriminative ability was at least > 0.79, with most demonstrating discriminative ability > 0.82.

[CONCLUSION] Use of prostate biopsy decision-making tools provides avenues for individualized health care based on patient-specific risk factors. This study has successfully completed external validation of nine risk calculators, with one demonstrating adequate discriminatory capacity in all patients and three in biopsy-naïve patients. Systemic use may have a 12% net clinical benefit amongst biopsy-naïve patients, thereby reducing healthcare system burden.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반