본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Enhancement of inter-/intra-reader agreement using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound software fusion prostate biopsy.

Investigative and clinical urology 2025 Vol.66(5) p. 405-415

Song WH, Kim TU, Ryu HS, Yun MS, Park SW

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] This study evaluated inter-/intra-reader agreement with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Song WH, Kim TU, et al. (2025). Enhancement of inter-/intra-reader agreement using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound software fusion prostate biopsy.. Investigative and clinical urology, 66(5), 405-415. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20250208
MLA Song WH, et al.. "Enhancement of inter-/intra-reader agreement using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound software fusion prostate biopsy.." Investigative and clinical urology, vol. 66, no. 5, 2025, pp. 405-415.
PMID 40897659

Abstract

[PURPOSE] This study evaluated inter-/intra-reader agreement with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We enrolled 210 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for clinically suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer. Four readers, including two urologists, viewed patients' mpMRI and scored PI-RADS between two sessions, including the time for feedback and training after the first reading session. Inter- and intra-reader agreements were evaluated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (κ), agreement coefficient 1 (AC1), and percentage of agreement (PA).

[RESULTS] The overall inter-reader agreement between all readers was moderate (κ=0.466, AC1=0.522, and PA=0.610). The overall inter-reader agreement improved in the second session. The agreement for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions was higher than that for transitional zone (TZ) lesions. At a PI-RADS cut-off of 4, the agreement for PZ lesions was almost perfect (PA=0.888) and higher than that for TZ lesions. The inter-reader agreement for lesions with a PI-RADS ≥4 and Gleason score ≥7 was almost perfect (AC1=0.960 and PA=0.964). The intra-reader agreement for lesions overall and PI-RADS ≥4 lesions were substantial (AC1=0.601) and almost perfect (PA=0.876), respectively.

[CONCLUSIONS] Readers achieved moderate agreement for PI-RADS version 2.1 and benefitted from training sessions. Feedback, training, and multidisciplinary discussions also improved inter-reader agreement. Our study can provide guidance, updates, and further steps for the standardization and improvement of PI-RADS scoring.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Aged; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Image-Guided Biopsy; Prostate; Software; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)