본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Genomic Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy: Post Hoc Assessment of a Phase II Clinical Trial.

1/5 보강
JCO precision oncology 2025 Vol.9() p. e2500535
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
17 patients (46%).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
hemigland cryoablation of the prostate (2017-2021; n = 108)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] In patients with PCa otherwise suitable for management with focal therapy, a high GC score (≥0.45) was independently associated with treatment failure. A GC score derived from diagnostic biopsy can be used to help predict focal therapy outcomes.

Weiner AB, Proudfoot JA, Aker M, Cardenas M, Gonzalez S, Kelly E, Davicioni E, Sisk AE, Brisbane WG, Marks LS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] A biomarker to help predict outcomes after prostate cancer (PCa) focal therapy would be of considerable interest.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 108
  • 95% CI 1.05 to 6.51

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Weiner AB, Proudfoot JA, et al. (2025). Genomic Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy: Post Hoc Assessment of a Phase II Clinical Trial.. JCO precision oncology, 9, e2500535. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00535
MLA Weiner AB, et al.. "Genomic Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy: Post Hoc Assessment of a Phase II Clinical Trial.." JCO precision oncology, vol. 9, 2025, pp. e2500535.
PMID 40961406
DOI 10.1200/PO-25-00535

Abstract

[PURPOSE] A biomarker to help predict outcomes after prostate cancer (PCa) focal therapy would be of considerable interest. We sought to assess the association between treatment failure after focal therapy and the Decipher score, a tumor-based genomic classifier (GC).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We performed a post hoc analysis of a single-center phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03503643) in which patients with unilateral grade group (GG) 2-4 PCa (n = 108) underwent hemigland cryoablation of the prostate (2017-2021; n = 108). Pretreatment biopsy tissue was subjected to transcriptomic profiling to generate GC scores. The primary outcome was the association between GC-low (<0.45) versus GC-high (≥0.45) and in-field recurrence (GG ≥2) on magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy 6 months post-treatment, evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.

[RESULTS] In the GC-high group (n = 37), treatment failure occurred in 17 patients (46%). In the GC-low group (n = 71), treatment failure occurred in 15 patients (21%). These differences were statistically significant (odds ratio [OR], 2.61 [95% CI, 1.05 to 6.51]; = .04). Differences at 18 months were also significant (76% 44%; OR, 3.58 [95% CI, 1.37 to 9.36], = .009).

[CONCLUSION] In patients with PCa otherwise suitable for management with focal therapy, a high GC score (≥0.45) was independently associated with treatment failure. A GC score derived from diagnostic biopsy can be used to help predict focal therapy outcomes.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Aged; Middle Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cryosurgery; Genomics; Treatment Failure; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)