본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Detection rates for prostate cancer using PI-RADS 2.1 upgrading rules in transition zone lesions align with risk assessment categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

메타분석 1/5 보강
European radiology 📖 저널 OA 35.5% 2022: 1/4 OA 2023: 0/7 OA 2024: 2/11 OA 2025: 18/71 OA 2026: 73/165 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.35(10) p. 6454-6465
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
5 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Clinical relevance Upgraded TZ lesions may impact individualized biopsy-decisions, especially as "3 + 1" lesions harbor significant disease in 2-out-of-5 patients. Still, the high rate of grade group = 1 and benign findings in these sub-categories emphasizes the need for strategies to minimize overdiagnosis.

Agrotis G, Pooch EP, Marsitopoulos K, Vlychou M, Benndorf M, Beets-Tan RGH

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate and compare cancer detection rates (CDRs) of transition zone (TZ) lesions upgraded from PI-RADSv2.1 score 2 to 3 ("2 + 1") or from 3 to 4 ("3 + 1") using DWI and assess their c

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.003
  • p-value p = 0.009
  • 연구 설계 meta-analysis

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Agrotis G, Pooch EP, et al. (2025). Detection rates for prostate cancer using PI-RADS 2.1 upgrading rules in transition zone lesions align with risk assessment categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. European radiology, 35(10), 6454-6465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11618-w
MLA Agrotis G, et al.. "Detection rates for prostate cancer using PI-RADS 2.1 upgrading rules in transition zone lesions align with risk assessment categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.." European radiology, vol. 35, no. 10, 2025, pp. 6454-6465.
PMID 40287872 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate and compare cancer detection rates (CDRs) of transition zone (TZ) lesions upgraded from PI-RADSv2.1 score 2 to 3 ("2 + 1") or from 3 to 4 ("3 + 1") using DWI and assess their clinical impact.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline, and Web of Science for studies assessing TZ lesions with DWI in PI-RADSv2.1, with histology-confirmed grade group ≥ 2 cancer (GG ≥ 2) as the primary outcome. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUADAS-2. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, CDRs, and odds ratios (ORs) were estimated at the lesion level using a bivariate binomial random-effects model.

[RESULTS] Eight studies with 1535 TZ lesions were included. GG ≥ 2 CDRs for PI-RADS scores of 1, 2, 2 + 1, 3, 3 + 1, 4, and 5 were 2% (95%CI: 0%-12%), 6% (4%-10%), 13% (6%-23%), 19% (15%-25%), 37% (24%-52%), 49% (32%-67%), and 73% (66%-79%), respectively. Scores of 2 + 1 had higher GG ≥ 2 CDRs than 2 (OR 3.37 (1.53-7.44), p = 0.003) but were similar to 3 (OR 0.80 (0.44-1.45), p = 0.46). Scores of 3 + 1 had higher GG ≥ 2 CDRs than 3 (OR 2.67 (1.27-5.59), p = 0.009) but were similar to 4 (OR 0.68 (0.33-1.44), p = 0.32). False-positive rates remained substantial (≥ 2 + 1: 69% (55%-80%); ≥ 3: 54% (46%-62%)).

[CONCLUSION] The risk of having significant prostate cancer in "2 + 1" and "3 + 1" TZ lesions, with an upgrading based on DWI images, is appropriately categorized within the PI-RADS v2.1 scoring system, as shown by this meta-analysis.

[KEY POINTS] Question PI-RADS v2.1 incorporates rules allowing scores of some transition zone (TZ) lesions to be increased. Literature on the clinical impact of these rules is scarce. Findings For TZ lesions upgraded with DWI: "2 + 1" lesions show a cancer detection rate (CDR) of 13%, and "3 + 1" lesions show a CDR of 37%. Clinical relevance Upgraded TZ lesions may impact individualized biopsy-decisions, especially as "3 + 1" lesions harbor significant disease in 2-out-of-5 patients. Still, the high rate of grade group = 1 and benign findings in these sub-categories emphasizes the need for strategies to minimize overdiagnosis.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기