본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Enhanced Image Quality and Comparable Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Fast Bi-MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction.

1/5 보강
Academic radiology 2025 Vol.32(10) p. 5964-5974
Retraction 확인
출처

Shen L, Yuan Y, Liu J, Cheng Y, Liao Q, Shi R, Xiong T, Xu H, Wang L, Yang Z

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES] To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of prostate biparametric MRI (bi-MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P<0.05
  • p-value P < 0.05

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Shen L, Yuan Y, et al. (2025). Enhanced Image Quality and Comparable Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Fast Bi-MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction.. Academic radiology, 32(10), 5964-5974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.06.059
MLA Shen L, et al.. "Enhanced Image Quality and Comparable Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Fast Bi-MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction.." Academic radiology, vol. 32, no. 10, 2025, pp. 5964-5974.
PMID 40683764

Abstract

[RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES] To evaluate image quality and diagnostic performance of prostate biparametric MRI (bi-MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This prospective study included 61 adult male urological patients undergoing prostate MRI with standard-of-care (SOC) and fast protocols. Sequences included T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. DLR images were generated from FAST datasets. Three groups (SOC, FAST, DLR) were compared using: (1) five-point Likert scale, (2) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), (3) lesion slope profiles, (4) dorsal capsule edge rise distance (ERD). PI-RADS scores were assigned to dominant lesions. ADC values were measured in histopathologically confirmed cases. Diagnostic performance was analyzed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity). Statistical tests included Friedman test, one-way ANOVA with post hoc analyses, and DeLong test for ROC comparisons (P<0.05).

[RESULTS] FAST scanning protocols reduced acquisition time by nearly half compared to the SOC scanning protocol. When compared to T2WI, DLR significantly improved SNR, CNR, slope profile, and ERD (P < 0.05). Similarly, DLR significantly enhanced SNR, CNR, and image sharpness when compared to DWI (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in PI-RADS scores and ADC values between groups (P > 0.05). The areas under the ROC curves, sensitivity, and specificity of ADC values for distinguishing benign and malignant lesions remained consistent (P > 0.05).

[CONCLUSION] DLR enhances image quality in fast prostate bi-MRI while preserving PI-RADS classification accuracy and ADC diagnostic performance.

MeSH Terms

Male; Humans; Deep Learning; Prostatic Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Aged; Sensitivity and Specificity; Prostate; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Signal-To-Noise Ratio

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)