Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric. [CONCLUSION] The probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.
[PURPOSE] Poor quality prostate MRI images compromise diagnostic accuracy, with diffusion-weighted imaging and the resulting apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps being particularly vulnerable.
- p-value p < 0.001
- p-value p = 0.006
- Sensitivity 90 %
- 연구 설계 cross-sectional
APA
Brender JR, Ota M, et al. (2025). Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.. European journal of radiology, 191, 112317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112317
MLA
Brender JR, et al.. "Predicting ADC map quality from T2-weighted MRI: A deep learning approach for early quality assessment to assist point-of-care.." European journal of radiology, vol. 191, 2025, pp. 112317.
PMID
40690835
Abstract
[PURPOSE] Poor quality prostate MRI images compromise diagnostic accuracy, with diffusion-weighted imaging and the resulting apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps being particularly vulnerable. These maps are critical for prostate cancer diagnosis, yet current methods relying on standardizing technical parameters fail to consistently ensure image quality. We propose a novel deep learning approach to predict low-quality ADC maps using T2-weighted (T2W) images, enabling real-time corrective interventions during imaging.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A multi-site dataset of T2W images and ADC maps from 486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed. A neural network was trained to classify ADC map quality as "diagnostic" or "non-diagnostic" based solely on T2W images. Rectal cross-sectional area measurements were evaluated as an interpretable metric for susceptibility-induced distortions.
[RESULTS] Analysis revealed limited correlation between individual acquisition parameters and image quality, with horizontal phase encoding significant for T2 imaging (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.6735) and vertical resolution for ADC maps (p = 0.006, AUC = 0.6348). By contrast, the neural network achieved robust performance for ADC map quality prediction from T2 images, with 83 % sensitivity and 90 % negative predictive value in multicenter validation, comparable to single-site models using ADC maps directly. Remarkably, it generalized well to unseen in-house data (94 ± 2 % accuracy). Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric.
[CONCLUSION] The probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A multi-site dataset of T2W images and ADC maps from 486 patients, spanning 62 external clinics and in-house imaging, was retrospectively analyzed. A neural network was trained to classify ADC map quality as "diagnostic" or "non-diagnostic" based solely on T2W images. Rectal cross-sectional area measurements were evaluated as an interpretable metric for susceptibility-induced distortions.
[RESULTS] Analysis revealed limited correlation between individual acquisition parameters and image quality, with horizontal phase encoding significant for T2 imaging (p < 0.001, AUC = 0.6735) and vertical resolution for ADC maps (p = 0.006, AUC = 0.6348). By contrast, the neural network achieved robust performance for ADC map quality prediction from T2 images, with 83 % sensitivity and 90 % negative predictive value in multicenter validation, comparable to single-site models using ADC maps directly. Remarkably, it generalized well to unseen in-house data (94 ± 2 % accuracy). Rectal cross-sectional area correlated with ADC quality (AUC = 0.65), offering a simple, interpretable metric.
[CONCLUSION] The probability of low quality, uninterpretable ADC maps can be inferred early in the imaging process by a neural network approach, allowing corrective action to be employed.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Deep Learning; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Middle Aged; Aged; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Neural Networks, Computer; Magnetic Resonance Imaging