Analysis of dosimetric improvements using hydrogel spacer in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
28 patients, who underwent HDR-BT using HS.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
HDR-BT using HS
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
These regions are anatomically closer to the rectum and are often subject to dose constraints as well as critical areas for sufficient dose delivery because of the frequent localization of prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, HS is particularly beneficial for patients with dominant lesions in these regions.
[PURPOSE] This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of a hydrogel spacer (HS) on dosimetric distribution in the planning target volume as well as on rectal and urethral doses in high-dose-rat
APA
Honda M, Oshikane T, et al. (2025). Analysis of dosimetric improvements using hydrogel spacer in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.. Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 17(5), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2025.155737
MLA
Honda M, et al.. "Analysis of dosimetric improvements using hydrogel spacer in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.." Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, vol. 17, no. 5, 2025, pp. 315-321.
PMID
41340830
Abstract
[PURPOSE] This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effects of a hydrogel spacer (HS) on dosimetric distribution in the planning target volume as well as on rectal and urethral doses in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer, and to identify prostate sub-regions with improved dosimetric parameters and patient conditions that particularly benefit from the use of HS.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] This study included 28 patients, who underwent HDR-BT using HS. Treatment plans with HS and simulated plans without HS were compared. The prostate was divided into six regions: ventral and dorsal in the dorsoventral direction, and apex, mid-gland, and base in the craniocaudal direction. V and D were evaluated in each region, along with dose assessments for the rectum and urethra. Paired -tests were performed to analyze significance, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.
[RESULTS] HS significantly improved V in the dorsal regions ( < 0.05), particularly in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median V with and without HS: apex, 100.00 vs. 97.10; mid, 100.00 vs. 97.22). D showed improvement across all regions ( < 0.05), with greater effects observed in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median D with and without HS: apex, 110.15 vs. 103.56; mid, 113.31 vs. 106.21; d ≥ 0.8). Rectal dose parameters improved significantly ( < 0.05), whereas urethral dose changes were not significant ( = 0.14).
[CONCLUSIONS] HS effectively reduced rectal doses and improved V and D in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions of the prostate. These regions are anatomically closer to the rectum and are often subject to dose constraints as well as critical areas for sufficient dose delivery because of the frequent localization of prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, HS is particularly beneficial for patients with dominant lesions in these regions.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] This study included 28 patients, who underwent HDR-BT using HS. Treatment plans with HS and simulated plans without HS were compared. The prostate was divided into six regions: ventral and dorsal in the dorsoventral direction, and apex, mid-gland, and base in the craniocaudal direction. V and D were evaluated in each region, along with dose assessments for the rectum and urethra. Paired -tests were performed to analyze significance, and effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's d.
[RESULTS] HS significantly improved V in the dorsal regions ( < 0.05), particularly in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median V with and without HS: apex, 100.00 vs. 97.10; mid, 100.00 vs. 97.22). D showed improvement across all regions ( < 0.05), with greater effects observed in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions (median D with and without HS: apex, 110.15 vs. 103.56; mid, 113.31 vs. 106.21; d ≥ 0.8). Rectal dose parameters improved significantly ( < 0.05), whereas urethral dose changes were not significant ( = 0.14).
[CONCLUSIONS] HS effectively reduced rectal doses and improved V and D in the dorsal apex and dorsal mid regions of the prostate. These regions are anatomically closer to the rectum and are often subject to dose constraints as well as critical areas for sufficient dose delivery because of the frequent localization of prostate cancer lesions. Therefore, HS is particularly beneficial for patients with dominant lesions in these regions.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Correction: Honda et al. Visual Evaluation of Ultrafast MRI in the Assessment of Residual Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Preliminary Study Association with Subtype. 2022, , 1522-1533.
- Breast cancer imaging without gadolinium-based contrast agent: A review of current applications and future trends.
- Multifocal Posterior Pigment Epitheliopathy Complicated by Circumferential Choroidal Detachment Treated With Fluorescein Angiography-Guided Focal Laser Photocoagulation: A Case Report.
- Surgical manipulation related to the risk of postoperative complications in laparoscopic gastrectomy: a case-control study assessing full surgical videos.
- Determinants of Shorter Surveillance Colonoscopy Intervals: A Nationwide Real-World Study in Japan.