본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Study of the predictive value of testosterone in androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer-the dual clinical research center for western and eastern China.

Frontiers in endocrinology 2025 Vol.16() p. 1630862

Ma D, Zhang X, Xi J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] This study aims to investigate the association between early testosterone (T) response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Ma D, Zhang X, Xi J (2025). Study of the predictive value of testosterone in androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer-the dual clinical research center for western and eastern China.. Frontiers in endocrinology, 16, 1630862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2025.1630862
MLA Ma D, et al.. "Study of the predictive value of testosterone in androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer-the dual clinical research center for western and eastern China.." Frontiers in endocrinology, vol. 16, 2025, pp. 1630862.
PMID 41169478

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] This study aims to investigate the association between early testosterone (T) response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and clinical outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

[METHODS] This retrospective cohort study analyzed 366 mHSPC patients treated at The People's Hospital Bozhou and The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. The participants were stratified by 1-month testosterone response: response group (T < 50 ng/dL) and non-response group (T > 50 ng/dL). The response group was further subdivided into ultra-low (T < 20 ng/dL) and low (20-50 ng/dL) response groups. Comparative analyses of baseline characteristics, progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and survival outcomes were carried out.

[RESULTS] No significant intergroup differences were observed in Gleason score, tumor stage, prostate volume, initial PSA, PSA density, perineural invasion, visceral metastasis, or hazard level (all > 0.05). However, the T non-response group exhibited a higher tumor load prevalence (76.77% vs. 60.10%, = 0.004). The T non-response group demonstrated shorter mCRPC progression time (13.38 ± 8.88 vs. 20.40 ± 11.91 months, < 0.001), though no difference emerged between the T ultra-low and low response subgroups (20.59 ± 11.91 vs. 20.86 ± 12.19 months, = 0.876). Survival analysis revealed superior 3-year survival in T responders ( = 0.024), with T ultra-low responders showing significant advantages in both overall survival ( = 0.010) and 3-year survival ( = 0.001) compared to T low responders.

[CONCLUSION] Ultra-low T levels (<20 ng/dL) after 1-month ADT can be used as a reference standard for predicting survival outcomes and may guide treatment optimization in mHSPC.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Testosterone; Retrospective Studies; Androgen Antagonists; Aged; Middle Aged; China; Prostatic Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Prognosis; Neoplasm Metastasis; Aged, 80 and over

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)