Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
4044 patients) and validation (2084 patients) cohorts.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
PSMA-PET at 20 hospitals in Europe, USA, and Australia between 2013 and 2022
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
PPP2 yielded superior accuracy to the NCCN risk score. A free software tool has been created for PROMISE and PPP2 assessments (promise-pet.org).
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] We established prognostic nomograms incorporating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters standardised by Prostate Cancer Mol
- 표본수 (n) 1034
- p-value p < 0.001
APA
Karpinski MJ, Rahbar K, et al. (2025). Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study.. European urology, 88(5), 484-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.04.017
MLA
Karpinski MJ, et al.. "Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study.." European urology, vol. 88, no. 5, 2025, pp. 484-495.
PMID
40318933
Abstract
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] We established prognostic nomograms incorporating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters standardised by Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE; PPP1). Here, we develop an updated PPP2 risk score from a large international multicentre registry study.
[METHODS] We included 6128 prostate cancer patients who underwent PSMA-PET at 20 hospitals in Europe, USA, and Australia between 2013 and 2022. Investigator sites were split 2:1 into the development (4044 patients) and validation (2084 patients) cohorts. We created nomograms of version 2 (PPP2) based on Cox regression models with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty for overall survival (development cohort). Performance of both nomograms was measured using Harrell's C-index and calibration plots and a head-to-head comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score by receiver operating characteristic curves (validation cohort).
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Predictors were distant metastases (extrapelvic nodal metastases [M1a], bone metastases [M1b], and visceral metastases [M1c]), PSMA expression score, and total lesion count (visual PPP2) or total tumour volume (quantitative PPP2). C-indices (95% confidence interval) in the validation cohort were 0.80 (0.78-0.82; visual) and 0.80 (0.79-0.82; quantitative), respectively. Accuracy of both the PPP2 nomograms was superior to the NCCN risk score (n = 1034, area under the curve 0.84 vs 0.76; p < 0.001). The retrospective design represents a limitation of the study.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] PPP nomograms were improved in an international multicentre study to predict accurately the 3- and 5-yr overall survival probabilities of prostate cancer. PPP2 yielded superior accuracy to the NCCN risk score. A free software tool has been created for PROMISE and PPP2 assessments (promise-pet.org).
[METHODS] We included 6128 prostate cancer patients who underwent PSMA-PET at 20 hospitals in Europe, USA, and Australia between 2013 and 2022. Investigator sites were split 2:1 into the development (4044 patients) and validation (2084 patients) cohorts. We created nomograms of version 2 (PPP2) based on Cox regression models with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty for overall survival (development cohort). Performance of both nomograms was measured using Harrell's C-index and calibration plots and a head-to-head comparison with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score by receiver operating characteristic curves (validation cohort).
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Predictors were distant metastases (extrapelvic nodal metastases [M1a], bone metastases [M1b], and visceral metastases [M1c]), PSMA expression score, and total lesion count (visual PPP2) or total tumour volume (quantitative PPP2). C-indices (95% confidence interval) in the validation cohort were 0.80 (0.78-0.82; visual) and 0.80 (0.79-0.82; quantitative), respectively. Accuracy of both the PPP2 nomograms was superior to the NCCN risk score (n = 1034, area under the curve 0.84 vs 0.76; p < 0.001). The retrospective design represents a limitation of the study.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] PPP nomograms were improved in an international multicentre study to predict accurately the 3- and 5-yr overall survival probabilities of prostate cancer. PPP2 yielded superior accuracy to the NCCN risk score. A free software tool has been created for PROMISE and PPP2 assessments (promise-pet.org).
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
- Humans
- Male
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Aged
- Registries
- Risk Assessment
- Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II
- Middle Aged
- Positron-Emission Tomography
- Nomograms
- Molecular Imaging
- Antigens
- Surface
- Prognosis
- Overall survival
- Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation nomogram
- Prostate cancer
- Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- New prostate cancer risk groups by PSMA-PET (PPP3): an international, retrospective, registry-based cohort study.
- Association Between the PRIMARY Score at Staging Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Overall Survival Among Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer: Findings from the International, Multicenter PROMISE Registry.
- Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for novel risk-stratification of biochemical recurrence.
- Reply to Zhengbo Pan, Run Shi, and Zhaokai Zhou's Letter to the Editor - Re: Madeleine J. Karpinski, Kambiz Rahbar, Martin Bögemann, et al. Updated Prostate Cancer Risk Groups by Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PPP2): Results from an International Multicentre Registry Study. Eur Urol. 2025;88:484-495.