'I don't know if there's a happy ending to this story': An analysis of prostate cancer narratives in a follow-up setting.

Prostate cancer, the most common cancer among Finnish men, has a high survival rate. Treatment options vary from active surveillance to radical treatments, with potential long-term or permanent side effects. Traditional cancer narratives frame cancer as a tragedy or a hero story and thus fail to capture the chronic nature of prostate cancer and its impacts on patients' lives. This study analyses the narratives of 22 prostate cancer patients, interviewed twice (1 and 3 years after diagnosis). We found two recurring storylines of prostate cancer narratives, one from radically treated men and the other from men under active surveillance. We analysed how cultural plot types - hero story, tragedy, comedy and irony - appear in the narratives. While tragedy dominated narratives, re-interviews also revealed irony as the tragic elements were caused by the treatment side effects, not the cancer itself. Comedic elements emerged when side effects were reframed as symptoms of ageing. Narratives took on heroic features if the cancer was cured or non-aggressive. The findings underscore the importance of diverse cultural representations to reflect the multifaceted experience of living with prostate cancer and the need for long-term support with the physical and psychological aspects of prostate cancer.