Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy with or Without Metastasis-directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The Multicenter Phase 2 Randomized EXTEND Trial.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
174 patients were randomized and were eligible for the primary analysis.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] MDT + ADT improves PFS compared with ADT in omPC patients, meriting phase 3 confirmation. Hypothesis-generating immune responses warrant mechanistic validation and future trials with T-cell-targeted immunotherapies.
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC) is characterized by limited metastases.
- 표본수 (n) 87
- p-value p = 0.036
- p-value p < 0.001
APA
Sherry AD, Siddiqui BA, et al. (2025). Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy with or Without Metastasis-directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The Multicenter Phase 2 Randomized EXTEND Trial.. European urology, 88(5), 496-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.07.006
MLA
Sherry AD, et al.. "Continuous Androgen Deprivation Therapy with or Without Metastasis-directed Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The Multicenter Phase 2 Randomized EXTEND Trial.." European urology, vol. 88, no. 5, 2025, pp. 496-509.
PMID
40750497 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC) is characterized by limited metastases. We hypothesized that metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to all sites of omPC combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) would improve clinical outcomes.
[METHODS] In the multicenter phase 2 EXTEND trial, patients with omPC were randomized 1:1 to ADT versus MDT + ADT in two independently powered and randomized baskets, one using intermittent ADT and one using continuous ADT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included radiologic PFS (rPFS) and castration resistance-free survival (CRFS). Here, the primary results of the continuous ADT basket, the combined analysis of both baskets, and translational immune correlatives are reported.
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] From September 2018 through August 2022, 174 patients were randomized and were eligible for the primary analysis. In the continuous ADT basket (N = 87), the median PFS was 47 mo with MDT + ADT versus 22 mo with ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; one-sided p = 0.036). In the combined analysis, the median PFS was 36 mo with MDT + ADT versus 17 mo with ADT (HR, 0.45; p < 0.001). Radiologic PFS and CRFS were also superior with MDT + ADT. Durable clinical responses after MDT + ADT were associated with systemic Th1-polarizing cytokine upregulation and CD8 T-cell proliferation. Compared with ADT, MDT + ADT induced greater systemic immune activation, including T-cell receptor expansion/contraction, which we also observed in the independent ORIOLE trial of MDT. The greatest PFS benefit after MDT + ADT was observed in patients with systemic T-cell receptor expansion/contraction.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] MDT + ADT improves PFS compared with ADT in omPC patients, meriting phase 3 confirmation. Hypothesis-generating immune responses warrant mechanistic validation and future trials with T-cell-targeted immunotherapies.
[METHODS] In the multicenter phase 2 EXTEND trial, patients with omPC were randomized 1:1 to ADT versus MDT + ADT in two independently powered and randomized baskets, one using intermittent ADT and one using continuous ADT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included radiologic PFS (rPFS) and castration resistance-free survival (CRFS). Here, the primary results of the continuous ADT basket, the combined analysis of both baskets, and translational immune correlatives are reported.
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] From September 2018 through August 2022, 174 patients were randomized and were eligible for the primary analysis. In the continuous ADT basket (N = 87), the median PFS was 47 mo with MDT + ADT versus 22 mo with ADT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; one-sided p = 0.036). In the combined analysis, the median PFS was 36 mo with MDT + ADT versus 17 mo with ADT (HR, 0.45; p < 0.001). Radiologic PFS and CRFS were also superior with MDT + ADT. Durable clinical responses after MDT + ADT were associated with systemic Th1-polarizing cytokine upregulation and CD8 T-cell proliferation. Compared with ADT, MDT + ADT induced greater systemic immune activation, including T-cell receptor expansion/contraction, which we also observed in the independent ORIOLE trial of MDT. The greatest PFS benefit after MDT + ADT was observed in patients with systemic T-cell receptor expansion/contraction.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] MDT + ADT improves PFS compared with ADT in omPC patients, meriting phase 3 confirmation. Hypothesis-generating immune responses warrant mechanistic validation and future trials with T-cell-targeted immunotherapies.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.