본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.

1/5 보강
Cancer science 📖 저널 OA 96.4% 2022: 1/1 OA 2023: 5/5 OA 2024: 13/13 OA 2025: 51/51 OA 2026: 88/94 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.116(11) p. 3113-3124
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.

Yatabe Y, Watanabe R, Kotera Y, Yasuoka S, Ennishi D

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Yatabe Y, Watanabe R, et al. (2025). Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.. Cancer science, 116(11), 3113-3124. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70174
MLA Yatabe Y, et al.. "Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.." Cancer science, vol. 116, no. 11, 2025, pp. 3113-3124.
PMID 40859679 ↗
DOI 10.1111/cas.70174

Abstract

Despite the advances in precision oncology through biomarker testing, not all patients are able to benefit from treatment decisions guided by tissue-based testing like comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, the application and integration of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice has not been fully defined in Japan. Clinical records were retrieved from the data repository of the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) in Japan. All records related to FoundationOne Liquid tests were evaluated from the database's inception in June 2019 to June 2023. Outcomes of interest included treatment patterns before and after testing, as well as mutations of interest. The seven most frequent tumor types (pancreas, prostate, biliary tract, bowel, lung, stomach and ovary) were stratified as part of subgroup analyses. Of 7461 patient records, the most prevalent cancers were pancreatic (24.5%), prostate (15.8%), and biliary tract (11.2%) cancers. Following molecular tumor board (MTB) review, 5.8% of cases received new treatments, predominantly targeted therapy (41.7%) and chemotherapy (40.9%), with 2.1% participating in clinical trials. Median durations from specimen collection to post-MTB treatment were 63 days. Tests for patients with bowel cancer (70/796; 8.8%) and lung cancer (57/695; 8.2%) received genotype-matched treatment most frequently, followed by tests for patients with prostate cancer (92/1182; 7.8%). Access to CGP in Japan appears more limited compared to other high-income countries. While CGP may be valuable for certain cancers, such as bowel, biliary, and prostate cancer, its benefit for other cancer types remains unclear.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기