The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.
- p-value P = 0.033
APA
Akpinar C, Kuru Oz D, et al. (2025). The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.. Urologic oncology, 43(12), 711.e1-711.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.011
MLA
Akpinar C, et al.. "The role of fusion-targeted prostate biopsy in clinically significant prostate cancer detection in elusive small-diameter lesions in high-volume prostates: Comparison of cognitive and fusion-targeted techniques.." Urologic oncology, vol. 43, no. 12, 2025, pp. 711.e1-711.e7.
PMID
40935763 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate whether fusion biopsy provides an advantage in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer(csPCa) in elusive small-diameter lesions, especially in high volume prostates.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.
[CONCLUSION] MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.
[MATERIAL AND METHODS] Data of 762 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging(mpMRI) before prostate biopsy at single center between January 2017 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. All of these patients underwent combined cognitive and fusion targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy of suspicious lesions and transrectal ultrasonography guided systematic biopsy by 2 separate experienced radiologists(with histopathological evaluation completed for all specimens). Lesions were categorized by diameter (≤5 mm, 6-10 mm, >10 mm) and prostate volumes (≤30 mL, 31-70 mL, >70 mL). (All patients underwent 3T mpMRI, and lesions were scored using PI-RADS v2.1. The largest lesion with the highest PI-RADS score was considered the index lesion.) RESULTS: Patient characteristics, including clinical and radiological features, were balanced between cognitive and fusion biopsy groups. PI-RADS stratification showed similar detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions between methods. For lesions ≤5 mm, fusion biopsy showed a significantly higher csPCa detection rate than cognitive biopsy (16.4% vs. 3%, P = 0.033). No clinical significant prostate cancer was detected in lesions ≤5 mm with prostate volumes >30 ml in cognitive biopsy group. For lesions 6-10 mm and >10 mm, detection rates were comparable between procedures.
[CONCLUSION] MRI Fusion-targeted biopsy is particularly advantageous for smaller lesions and in settings where precise lesion targeting is critical. However, for larger lesions or institutions with skilled operators, cognitive-targeted biopsy remains a viable and effective alternative.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.