본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

MRI-fusion biopsy era: the role of perineural invasion in low-risk prostate cancer.

1/5 보강
Current problems in cancer 2025 Vol.59() p. 101251
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
325 patients initially diagnosed with Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1 prostate cancer who underwent at least one subsequent biopsy.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
at least one subsequent biopsy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Sivanesan N, Diaz GM, Strachan S, Kandala K, Zhao X, Tan WS

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate whether perineural invasion independently predicts Gleason score upgrading during active surveillance in patients undergoing MRI-US fusion biopsy.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p = 0.03
  • p-value p=0.03

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sivanesan N, Diaz GM, et al. (2025). MRI-fusion biopsy era: the role of perineural invasion in low-risk prostate cancer.. Current problems in cancer, 59, 101251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2025.101251
MLA Sivanesan N, et al.. "MRI-fusion biopsy era: the role of perineural invasion in low-risk prostate cancer.." Current problems in cancer, vol. 59, 2025, pp. 101251.
PMID 40946534 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate whether perineural invasion independently predicts Gleason score upgrading during active surveillance in patients undergoing MRI-US fusion biopsy.

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 325 patients initially diagnosed with Gleason Grade Group (GGG) 1 prostate cancer who underwent at least one subsequent biopsy. Demographics, imaging, and clinical variables were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed the association between perineural invasion and Gleason upgrading (GGG2+) on follow-up biopsy.

[RESULTS] Among 325 eligible patients diagnosed with GGG 1 prostate cancer on initial biopsy, 51 (15%) had perineural invasion, while 274 (84%) did not. Gleason upgrade occurred in 110 (34%) patients. Upgrading was observed in 24 of 51 patients (47%) with perineural invasion, compared to 86 of 274 patients (32%) without perineural invasion (p = 0.03). On univariate analysis, older age (OR 1.03; p=0.03), African American race (OR 2.22; p=0.04), number of positive cores (OR 1.13; p=0.007), and cancer detected on targeted biopsy (OR 2.26; p=0.01) were associated with upgrading. In multivariable analysis, perineural invasion (OR 1.84; p=0.1) was not independently associated with Gleason upgrading when adjusting for PI-RADS 4-5 (OR 1.98; p=0.01). However, cancer detected on targeted biopsy (OR 2.26; p = 0.01) and African American race (OR 3.2; p = 0.01) remained independently associated with upgrading.

[CONCLUSIONS] In this contemporary series of patients managed with active surveillance in the era of MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy, perineural invasion is not associated with Gleason upgrade on subsequent biopsy when adjusting for MRI- US fusion biopsy characteristics. Our findings highlight that a PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion, and cancer found within an MRI-visible lesion are more predictive of subsequent progression in patients with GGG1 PCa.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반