본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of the G8-Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index as General Health Assessment Tools in Older Patients With Prostate Cancer.

1/5 보강
Clinical genitourinary cancer 📖 저널 OA 10.4% 2025: 1/56 OA 2026: 10/50 OA 2025~2026 2025 Vol.23(6) p. 102454
Retraction 확인
출처

Chys B, Debruyne PR, Decoster L, Kenis C, Wildiers H, Ponette D

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Frail and older patients who develop prostate cancer (PCa), are at risk of overtreatment.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 182
  • p-value P < .001
  • p-value P < .05
  • 95% CI 70.5-103.1
  • HR 1.3
  • 연구 설계 Case-control

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Chys B, Debruyne PR, et al. (2025). A Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of the G8-Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index as General Health Assessment Tools in Older Patients With Prostate Cancer.. Clinical genitourinary cancer, 23(6), 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102454
MLA Chys B, et al.. "A Multi-Center Comparative Analysis of the G8-Score and Charlson Comorbidity Index as General Health Assessment Tools in Older Patients With Prostate Cancer.." Clinical genitourinary cancer, vol. 23, no. 6, 2025, pp. 102454.
PMID 41193357 ↗

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Frail and older patients who develop prostate cancer (PCa), are at risk of overtreatment. Multiple general health assessment (GHA) tools have been validated in oncology. we aim to validate and compare the performance of the G8 screening tool, age and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in men older than 70 years with a newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Is it possible to identify a CCI cut-off indicative for frailty?

[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Between 2009 and 2015, a national multicenter initiative on geriatric screening and GHA's took place in Belgium. Baseline characteristics were collected on the date of inclusion on which a specialist nurse completed multiple GHA questionnaires for each patient. We performed a sub analysis on the prostate cancer (n = 182) cohort, ≥ 70 years old. GHA's were compared through multivariate-, Kaplan-Meier- and sensitivity analysis. If indicated, Case-control matching was applied to reduce variate heterogeneity. Ten-year OS is the primary endpoint.

[RESULTS] Men with a G8-score of ≤14 points had a significantly worse OS both in the unmatched: 86.8 months (95% CI: 70.5-103.1) vs. 137.9 months (95% CI: 129.4-146.4) (P < .001) and matched population: 99.3 months (95% CI 81.9-116.73) vs. 136.0 months (95% CI: 121.8-150.2) (P < .05). Defining frailty as the presence of comorbidities (CCI ≥ 1 point) shows inferior (HR:1.3, 95% CI: 0.8-2.1-AUC: 0.583) accuracy compared to the G8-score (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.5-AUC: 0.715). If the frailty threshold of the CCI is raised to ≥ 2 points, accuracy is matched (HR 4.9, 95% CI 2.8-8.4-AUC 0.735).

[CONCLUSION] This multicenter analysis validates the predictive value of the G8-score and CCI on OS in newly diagnosed PCa in the older patient. Both GHA's appear more accurate than age. A CCI ≥ 2 points approximates the sensitivity of G8 defined frailty. External validation of these findings is needed.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반