본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A head-to-head comparison of sextant-systematic biopsy vs. extended-systematic biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy: SEXTANT-PRO non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
EClinicalMedicine 2025 Vol.90() p. 103630
Retraction 확인
출처

Deng R, Shang J, Wu J, Tian S, Li D, Shen Q, Hu S, Shang M, Qiu J, Zhou J, Cai L, Gong K, Liu Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] In recent years, combined MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and 12-core extended systematic biopsy (SB) (TB + 12SB) has been recommended for biopsy-naïve patients with MRI-visible lesions for pros

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 252
  • p-value p < 0.05
  • 연구 설계 RCT

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Deng R, Shang J, et al. (2025). A head-to-head comparison of sextant-systematic biopsy vs. extended-systematic biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy: SEXTANT-PRO non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.. EClinicalMedicine, 90, 103630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103630
MLA Deng R, et al.. "A head-to-head comparison of sextant-systematic biopsy vs. extended-systematic biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy: SEXTANT-PRO non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.." EClinicalMedicine, vol. 90, 2025, pp. 103630.
PMID 41324010

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] In recent years, combined MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) and 12-core extended systematic biopsy (SB) (TB + 12SB) has been recommended for biopsy-naïve patients with MRI-visible lesions for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. However, extended biopsy increases complication burden and healthcare expenditure. This head-to-head RCT aims to compare the novel combined MRI-TB and sextant six-core SB (TB + 6SB) scheme and classical TB + 12SB for PCa diagnosis.

[METHODS] From December 2024 to June 2025, this single-center non-inferiority RCT (NCT06684652) consecutively enrolled 506 biopsy-naïve men with single suspicious lesion on prostate mpMRI. Patients were randomized to undergo TB + 12SB (n = 252) or TB + 6SB (n = 254) through transperineal cognitive fusion technique. The study outcome included clinically significant PCa [csPCa, grade group (GG) ≥2, primary outcome], diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, and health economic profiles.

[FINDINGS] The baseline characteristics were similar. The csPCa detection rate of TB + 6SB [54.3%, 138/254] was non-inferior to that of TB + 12SB [54.8%, (138/252)] [rate difference and 95% confidence interval: -0.5% (-9.2%, 8.3%)]. Comparable detection was also observed in PCa, high-grade PCa, and clinically insignificant PCa. The concordance in GG between biopsy and radical prostatectomy whole-mount specimens was similar for both TB + 12SB [52.3% (34/65), κ = 0.55] and TB + 6SB [51.7% (30/58), κ = 0.50] groups (p = 0.25). TB + 6SB demonstrated superior safety profiles through significantly relieving the discomfort during the procedure, reducing the post-biopsy pelvic pain, and significantly improving the quality of life (p < 0.05), while concurrently optimizing procedural workflow efficiency and histopathology resource utilization.

[INTERPRETATION] TB + 6SB achieves non-inferior diagnostic efficacy to classical TB + 12SB with reduced cores and improved safety, positioning it as an effective strategy for PCa diagnosis in biopsy-naïve patients with solitary MRI-suspicious lesions.

[FUNDING] Beijing Research Ward Excellence Program (BRWEP2024W054070105), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Interdepartmental Research Project of Peking University First Hospital, 2023IR27, 2024IR16).

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)