본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: The Combined Value of PHI and mpMRI.

1/5 보강
The Prostate 2026 Vol.86(1) p. 84-93
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
179 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2019 and 2023.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
prostate biopsy between 2019 and 2023
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The DCA showed a superior net benefit of the multivariable models compared to single-parameter strategies. [CONCLUSION] Integrating PHI and mpMRI improves PCa diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making, especially in ambiguous cases such as PI-RADS 3 lesions, and reduces unnecessary biopsies in clinical practice.

Yáñez-Castillo YM, Melgarejo-Segura MT, Arrabal-Polo MA, Jiménez-Pacheco A, García-Larios JV, De Haro Muñoz T, Lardelli-Claret P, Martín-Rodríguez JL, Arrabal-Martín M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is often hindered by the need to detect clinically significant disease (csPCa) while minimizing unnecessary biopsies.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Yáñez-Castillo YM, Melgarejo-Segura MT, et al. (2026). Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: The Combined Value of PHI and mpMRI.. The Prostate, 86(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70055
MLA Yáñez-Castillo YM, et al.. "Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: The Combined Value of PHI and mpMRI.." The Prostate, vol. 86, no. 1, 2026, pp. 84-93.
PMID 40981146
DOI 10.1002/pros.70055

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis is often hindered by the need to detect clinically significant disease (csPCa) while minimizing unnecessary biopsies. The Prostate Health Index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are promising tools to address these challenges.

[OBJECTIVE] To develop and internally validate a predictive model for PCa and csPCa by combining PHI and mpMRI in a high-risk population.

[METHODS] This retrospective study included 179 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2019 and 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised elevated PSA (> 3 ng/mL), suspicious digital rectal examination and/or family history, PHI values, and pre-biopsy mpMRI. Logistic regression models were developed, and model performance was assessed using C-statistics, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

[RESULTS] PCa was diagnosed in 40.2% of patients, and csPCa in 34.7% of them. A multivariate model including PHI, prostate volume, and mpMRI achieved an AUC of 0.81 for PCa. For csPCa, the best model combined PHI and prostate volume (AUC 0.76). In the PI-RADS 3 subgroup, PHI showed high discriminatory performance (AUC 0.81), surpassing PSA density (PSA-D). The DCA showed a superior net benefit of the multivariable models compared to single-parameter strategies.

[CONCLUSION] Integrating PHI and mpMRI improves PCa diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making, especially in ambiguous cases such as PI-RADS 3 lesions, and reduces unnecessary biopsies in clinical practice.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Middle Aged; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Biopsy