본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.

1/5 보강
The Prostate 📖 저널 OA 39% 2021: 1/1 OA 2025: 33/75 OA 2026: 32/94 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.86(1) p. 3-11
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
180 patients, 49% fulfilled EAU criteria.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
focal therapy as primary treatment (53% vs
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
These patients harbor worse BCR rates after robotic sRP. However, within our short-term follow-up, no differences in MFS and OS were observed.

Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nathan A, Moschovas MC, Wagner C, Calleris G, Di Maida F, Rivas JG, Bravi CA, Groote R, Piramide F, Turri F, Kowalczyk K, Sharma G, Andras I, Lambert E, Liakos N, Darlington D, Paciotti M, Sorce G, Mandel P, Galfano A, Nathan S, Marra G, Dell'Oglio P, Mottrie A, Chun FKH, Patel V, Breda A, Larcher A

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] EAU guidelines recommend salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) only in highly selected patients with recurrent prostate cancer in experienced centers.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.01
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • HR 2.94

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, et al. (2026). Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.. The Prostate, 86(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70048
MLA Wenzel M, et al.. "Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.." The Prostate, vol. 86, no. 1, 2026, pp. 3-11.
PMID 40990208 ↗
DOI 10.1002/pros.70048

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] EAU guidelines recommend salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) only in highly selected patients with recurrent prostate cancer in experienced centers.

[METHODS] The Junior ERUS/Young Academic Urologist Working Group on Robot-Assisted Surgery conducted a multicentric project to investigate biochemical recurrence-free (BCR), metastases-free (MFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes in robotic sRP patients stratified according to EAU criteria.

[RESULTS] Of 180 patients, 49% fulfilled EAU criteria. Patients not fulfilling EAU criteria more frequently underwent focal therapy as primary treatment (53% vs. 33%) and exhibited significantly higher rates of pT3-4 (70% vs. 48%), positive surgical margins (48% vs. 24%), and pathological Gleason score 8-10 (72% vs. 48%, all p < 0.01), with no differences in postoperative complications. Rates of PSA persistence were significantly higher in patients not fulfilling EAU criteria (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Regarding BCR, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored significantly worse BCR-free survival (hazard ratio (HR): 1.96, p = 0.046) with 24- and 48-month BCR-free survival rates of 81.7% and 73.9% vs. 65.0% and 58.5% for patients fulfilling EAU criteria. After multivariable adjustment, patients not fulfilling EAU criteria harbored higher risk of BCR (HR: 2.94, p = 0.045). Regarding MFS and OS outcomes, no significant differences were observed in the comparison between both groups. Incorporating presalvage surgery features into a new classification yielded better discrimination for BCR analysis, but were comparable to EAU criteria for MFS and OS outcomes.

[CONCLUSIONS] The majority of patients do not fulfill EAU criteria, and even more so after focal therapy. These patients harbor worse BCR rates after robotic sRP. However, within our short-term follow-up, no differences in MFS and OS were observed.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기