본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

A Novel Application of Decipher Testing in HoLEP Specimens for Risk Stratification of Incidentally Detected Prostate Cancer.

Urology 2026 Vol.207() p. 337-341

Handa N, Kaul H, Neill C, Proudfoot JA, Alam R, Huang MM, Davicioni E, Schaeffer EM, Krambeck AE, Ross AE

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVE] To assess the feasibility of Decipher testing for prostate cancer incidentally identified on specimens from holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 58,500

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Handa N, Kaul H, et al. (2026). A Novel Application of Decipher Testing in HoLEP Specimens for Risk Stratification of Incidentally Detected Prostate Cancer.. Urology, 207, 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.047
MLA Handa N, et al.. "A Novel Application of Decipher Testing in HoLEP Specimens for Risk Stratification of Incidentally Detected Prostate Cancer.." Urology, vol. 207, 2026, pp. 337-341.
PMID 41043617

Abstract

[OBJECTIVE] To assess the feasibility of Decipher testing for prostate cancer incidentally identified on specimens from holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Additionally, we sought to review Decipher GRID expression signatures in cancers identified on HoLEP compared to those identified on prostate biopsy.

[METHODS] We identified patients who had prostate cancer on HoLEP at our institution from August 2021 to July 2024 and subsequently underwent Decipher testing. Quality assurance testing was performed and transcriptomic signature expression patterns between HoLEP specimens and Grade Group (GG)-matched biopsy specimens were compared using standard mean differences (SMD).

[RESULTS] Of the 38 HoLEP specimens that underwent Decipher testing, 2 (5.3%) failed quality assurance testing due to lack of sufficient tumor present in the sample. Compared to GG-matched biopsy specimens (N=58,500), the HoLEP group (N=36) had similar median Decipher scores (0.56 vs 0.45, SMD 0.33) and lower median PSA (3.1 vs 6.2). HoLEP specimens were enriched for lower androgen receptor activity (SMD 0.63), basal subtypes by both PAM50 (SMD 1.23) and PSC (SMD 1.09), and ERG negative status (SMD 0.86). HoLEP specimens also had higher expression of activated CD4 (SMD 1.06), tertiary lymphoid structure (SMD 1.40), and angiogenesis (SMD 1.27).

[CONCLUSION] Decipher testing for HoLEP specimens is feasible, although clinical utility remains unclear. Compared to biopsy specimens, HoLEP specimens have increased immune and angiogenesis-related signature expression and lower AR-A expression suggesting that these tumors have unique microenvironments.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Aged; Incidental Findings; Lasers, Solid-State; Feasibility Studies; Middle Aged; Prostate; Biopsy; Prostatectomy; Retrospective Studies; Laser Therapy

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)