본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Impact of In-Office Dispensing Adoption by Urology Practices on Oral Specialty Drug Use in Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Cancer medicine 2026 Vol.15(1) p. e71475

Faraj KS, Oerline M, Kaufman SR, Dall C, Srivastava A, Liu X, Caram MEV, Shahinian VB, Hollenbeck BK

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] A paradigm shift in advanced prostate cancer toward the use of oral specialty drugs has been accompanied by increased involvement of urologists.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.001
  • 95% CI 1.2-6.5
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Faraj KS, Oerline M, et al. (2026). Impact of In-Office Dispensing Adoption by Urology Practices on Oral Specialty Drug Use in Advanced Prostate Cancer.. Cancer medicine, 15(1), e71475. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71475
MLA Faraj KS, et al.. "Impact of In-Office Dispensing Adoption by Urology Practices on Oral Specialty Drug Use in Advanced Prostate Cancer.." Cancer medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, 2026, pp. e71475.
PMID 41521275
DOI 10.1002/cam4.71475

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] A paradigm shift in advanced prostate cancer toward the use of oral specialty drugs has been accompanied by increased involvement of urologists. In fact, some urology groups can deliver these medications in the office, providing them directly to their patients.

[METHODS] A retrospective cohort study was performed using a 20% national sample of men with advanced prostate cancer enrolled in Traditional Medicare and managed by independent urology groups between 2011 and 2019. Urology groups with and without in-office dispensing were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess relationships between urology group characteristics and in-office dispensing. A difference-in-differences design was used to measure the effect of in-office dispensing on the use of oral specialty drugs within urology group markets compared to markets without dispensing.

[RESULTS] Urology group characteristics associated with adoption of in-office dispensing included large practice size (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.5), increasing volume of men with advanced prostate cancer (OR 1.1 per 10-patient increase, 95% CI 1.0-1.2), decreasing social vulnerability of the group's patient population (OR 0.81 per 0.1 unit increase, 95% CI 0.69-0.95), lower competition (OR 1.02 per 100 unit increase in the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index, 95% CI 1.0-1.1), and radiation vault ownership (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1-8.4). Compared with markets of urology groups that did not adopt in-office dispensing, adopting markets experienced a significant increase in oral specialty drug prescriptions (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate, 46 prescriptions per 1000 men, p < 0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] Adoption of in-office dispensing by independent urology groups increased oral specialty drug prescriptions for advanced prostate cancer within a group's market.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Aged; Urology; Administration, Oral; United States; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Antineoplastic Agents; Aged, 80 and over; Medicare

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)