본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Transgluteal MRI in-bore prostate biopsy in routine clinical practice: a contemporary-cohort-study from a german tertiary center.

1/5 보강
International urology and nephrology 📖 저널 OA 12.4% 2022: 0/2 OA 2023: 0/1 OA 2024: 0/1 OA 2025: 4/33 OA 2026: 7/49 OA 2022~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
496 patients (mean age 66 ± 8 years; PSA, median (IQR): 7.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
MRI-guided prostate biopsy between 2006 and 2024 at a German tertiary care center
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The low rate of upgrading after RPE supports its reliability in guiding patient management and avoiding overtreatment. [CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT] MRI-guided prostate biopsy enables accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with low risk of understaging, supporting its routine use in personalized urologic oncology.

Vogl T, Holzer M, Mahmoudi S, Grünewald L, Koch V, Gotta J

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To assess the diagnostic performance, predictors, and clinical utility of MRI-guided prostate biopsy over an 18 year period in a real-world tertiary care setting.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p < 0.02
  • 95% CI 1.35-10.13

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Vogl T, Holzer M, et al. (2026). Transgluteal MRI in-bore prostate biopsy in routine clinical practice: a contemporary-cohort-study from a german tertiary center.. International urology and nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04983-4
MLA Vogl T, et al.. "Transgluteal MRI in-bore prostate biopsy in routine clinical practice: a contemporary-cohort-study from a german tertiary center.." International urology and nephrology, 2026.
PMID 41483137 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To assess the diagnostic performance, predictors, and clinical utility of MRI-guided prostate biopsy over an 18 year period in a real-world tertiary care setting.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate biopsy between 2006 and 2024 at a German tertiary care center. Clinical data, PI-RADS, PSA levels, prostate volume, and biopsy outcomes were evaluated. Logistic regression models assessed associations between clinical variables and cancer detection, clinical significance (ISUP ≥ 3), and upgrading after radical prostatectomy (RPE).

[RESULTS] Among 496 patients (mean age 66 ± 8 years; PSA, median (IQR): 7.2 ng/ml (5-10)), cancer was detected in 33% (162/496), with 29% (47/162) classified as clinically significant. In our biopsy cohort (PI-RADS 3: 12.7%, PI-RADS 4: 43.0%, PI-RADS 5: 5.6%), clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP ≥ 3) was detected in 3.2% of PI-RADS 3, 12.2% of PI-RADS 4, and 28.6% of PI-RADS 5 lesions. PI-RADS 5 lesions were strongly associated with cancer detection (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.35-10.13) and significant disease (OR 7.1, 95% CI 1.38-55.15), independent of age, prostate volume, and biopsy extent. While these covariates predicted overall biopsy positivity (p < 0.02), they were not associated with significant cancer (p > 0.05) or upgrading at RPE (p > 0.05). Among 29 RPE patients, only one was upgraded. Post-biopsy CT was performed in all patients: MRI-guided biopsy was associated with a low complication rate: minor localized bleeding occurred in 4.4% of cases, and no major adverse events were observed.

[CONCLUSIONS] MRI-guided prostate biopsy showed high diagnostic accuracy and safety in routine care. PI-RADS was the key predictor of clinically significant cancer. The low rate of upgrading after RPE supports its reliability in guiding patient management and avoiding overtreatment.

[CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT] MRI-guided prostate biopsy enables accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer with low risk of understaging, supporting its routine use in personalized urologic oncology.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반