본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Retrospective evaluation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy multicriteria planning using physical dose versus radiobiological criteria for prostate cancer.

1/5 보강
Scientific reports 📖 저널 OA 96.2% 2021: 24/24 OA 2022: 32/32 OA 2023: 45/45 OA 2024: 140/140 OA 2025: 938/938 OA 2026: 692/767 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.16(1) p. 2561
Retraction 확인
출처

Iorio-Duval C, Bélanger C, Vigneault É, Beaulieu L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Radiobiological indices can provide insights into treatment efficacy beyond traditional physical dose metrics and potentially facilitate the comparison between various radiotherapy plans.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Iorio-Duval C, Bélanger C, et al. (2026). Retrospective evaluation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy multicriteria planning using physical dose versus radiobiological criteria for prostate cancer.. Scientific reports, 16(1), 2561. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32494-w
MLA Iorio-Duval C, et al.. "Retrospective evaluation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy multicriteria planning using physical dose versus radiobiological criteria for prostate cancer.." Scientific reports, vol. 16, no. 1, 2026, pp. 2561.
PMID 41554834 ↗

Abstract

Radiobiological indices can provide insights into treatment efficacy beyond traditional physical dose metrics and potentially facilitate the comparison between various radiotherapy plans. This study investigates the integration of radiobiological indices with standard physical dose criteria to improve high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy plan evaluation and selection process for the treatment of prostate cancers in a multicriteria optimization (MCO) framework. This is accomplished within the framework of a graphics processing unit-based multicriteria optimization algorithm, gMCO. 2000 Pareto-optimal plans for 200 patients were optimized for a 15 Gy HDR brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy (44 Gy in 22 fractions). Tumour control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and uncomplicated tumour control probability (UTCP) were calculated for each plan. Maximizing UTCP alone resulted in insufficient target coverage (target [Formula: see text]) according to clinical guidelines. Conversely, maximizing target coverage while meeting institutional criteria compromised UTCP significantly (reduction of about 0.09). Selecting plans that met all institutional criteria first, then maximizing UTCP, achieved a balanced compromise between tumour control and normal tissue safety. While combining UTCP and standard dose metrics based on dose-volume histogram (i.e., absorbed dose or physical dose constraints) with MCO can enhance brachytherapy plan optimization, exclusive reliance on standard TCP and NTCP models, using recommended parameters, yields clinically unacceptable plans.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기