본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

5 T versus 3 T MRI for prostate cancer: an intra-individual prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.

무작위 임상시험 1/5 보강
Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 📖 저널 OA 28% 2025: 43/142 OA 2026: 10/47 OA 2025~2026 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: suspected prostate cancer (PCa)
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
prostate scan at both 5 T and 3 T MRI systems
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] 5 T MRI effectively improves PCa assessment compared to 3 T. Our study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of 5 T MRI in PCa diagnosis and evaluation.

Xiong T, Shen L, Fan Y, Jiang M, Wang L, Yu D, Yang Z, Niu Y

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] To prospectively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of ultra-high-field 5 T MRI with that of standard 3 T in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa).

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Xiong T, Shen L, et al. (2026). 5 T versus 3 T MRI for prostate cancer: an intra-individual prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.. Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01073-z
MLA Xiong T, et al.. "5 T versus 3 T MRI for prostate cancer: an intra-individual prospective comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.." Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026.
PMID 41559204 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] To prospectively compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of ultra-high-field 5 T MRI with that of standard 3 T in patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa).

[METHODS] Sixty-seven consecutive patients received prostate scan at both 5 T and 3 T MRI systems. Two radiologists independently evaluated the images in a double-blind manner. A head-to-head comparison of 5 T and 3 T MRI was conducted from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Pathological results from prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy were used as the gold standard to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

[RESULTS] 5 T MRI demonstrated superior image quality and enhanced visualization of prostatic anatomical structures, including prostatic capsule, seminal vesicle and neurovascular bundles. The lesion delineation was significantly improved in 5 T MRI. The elevated field strength resulted in a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, edge rise distance and lesion slope profile in both T2WI and DWI sequences without introducing additional artifacts. Moreover, 5 T MRI demonstrated improved diagnostic performance for biopsy outcomes and pathological features than 3 T.

[CONCLUSION] 5 T MRI effectively improves PCa assessment compared to 3 T. Our study provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of 5 T MRI in PCa diagnosis and evaluation.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)