본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Contemporary Preoperative Detection of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer.

리뷰 1/5 보강
Cancers 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 20/20 OA 2022: 79/79 OA 2023: 89/89 OA 2024: 156/156 OA 2025: 683/683 OA 2026: 512/512 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.18(3) OA
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
Clinical parameters and traditional nomograms provide moderate accuracy for EPE detection.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Binary EPE classification has limited clinical value, while side-specific and graded EPE assessment offers a more clinically relevant approach. Translation of these tools into routine practice will require multimodal, side-specific, and externally validated models supported by automated segmentation and explainable artificial intelligence frameworks.

Stępka J, Milecki T, Ksepka J, Kujawska A, Hendrysiak J, Cieślikowski WA

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Extraprostatic extension (EPE) is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer and influences nerve-sparing decisions during radical prostatectomy.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Stępka J, Milecki T, et al. (2026). Contemporary Preoperative Detection of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer.. Cancers, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18030456
MLA Stępka J, et al.. "Contemporary Preoperative Detection of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer.." Cancers, vol. 18, no. 3, 2026.
PMID 41681930 ↗

Abstract

Extraprostatic extension (EPE) is an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer and influences nerve-sparing decisions during radical prostatectomy. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the standard for local staging, but its sensitivity for EPE remains limited, and its interpretation is subject to inter-reader variability. In this narrative review, we aim to create an overview of contemporary strategies for the preoperative detection of EPE. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, focusing on studies published between 2015 and 2025 including articles evaluating clinical parameters, mpMRI features, nomograms, radiomics, machine learning, and deep learning models for EPE prediction. The analyzed literature was compared with respect to diagnostic performance, validation strategy, and clinical applicability of individual methods. Clinical parameters and traditional nomograms provide moderate accuracy for EPE detection. mpMRI improves staging, with tumor-capsule contact length as the most important single imaging marker. Radiomics-based and machine-learning models matched and occasionally outperform conventional approaches, achieving AUC values ranging from 0.75 to 0.85. Deep-learning models demonstrated similar performance by directly analyzing imaging data, although most lacked external validation and were sensitive to dataset heterogeneity. Several radiomics and deep learning models demonstrated performance comparable to, and in selected studies exceeding, expert radiologist assessment. Binary EPE classification has limited clinical value, while side-specific and graded EPE assessment offers a more clinically relevant approach. Translation of these tools into routine practice will require multimodal, side-specific, and externally validated models supported by automated segmentation and explainable artificial intelligence frameworks.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기