본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The clinical application of prostate magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence reporting in histologically confirmed prostate cancer recurrence after radical radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology 2026 Vol.99(1178) p. 334-343

Rembak-Szynkiewicz J, Hebda A, Mazgaj P, Cortez AJ, Dyczkowski S, Kujawa K, Kołosza Z, Skrobisz K, Gabryś D

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To determine if histologically confirmed tumours were categorized as highly suspicious according to Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR).

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Rembak-Szynkiewicz J, Hebda A, et al. (2026). The clinical application of prostate magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence reporting in histologically confirmed prostate cancer recurrence after radical radiotherapy.. The British journal of radiology, 99(1178), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf273
MLA Rembak-Szynkiewicz J, et al.. "The clinical application of prostate magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence reporting in histologically confirmed prostate cancer recurrence after radical radiotherapy.." The British journal of radiology, vol. 99, no. 1178, 2026, pp. 334-343.
PMID 41212262
DOI 10.1093/bjr/tqaf273

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To determine if histologically confirmed tumours were categorized as highly suspicious according to Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR). Moreover, additional diffusion-weighted images/apparent diffusion coefficient (DWI/ADC) and dynamic contrast-enhancement parameters were analysed for more precise diagnosis.

[METHODS] A single-centre retrospective study on 145 patients (aged 70.8 ± 6.8) with prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy. Patients underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and biopsy (2007-2021). We employed nonparametric tests and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine the diagnostic value of the ADC parameter.

[RESULTS] Most patients 127 (87.6%) had a high and very high likelihood of local recurrence (PI-RR 4-5), while 18 (12%) had PI-RR 2-3. The ADC value of 1.13 × 10-3 mm2/s best differentiated between benign and malignant lesions (ROC AUC 0.859). PI-RR 2 and 3 scores were found in 2 and 16 patients, respectively. Of these lesions, 12 showed low ADC (<1.13 × 10-3 mm2/s), which could be considered malignant. As regards the enhancement curve, 6/18 had wash-out, 6/18 had plateau. Only 6/18 lesions had persistent curve enhancement (potentially benign). Considering ADC and enhancement curve type, only 2 lesions did not meet the criteria for malignancy.

[CONCLUSIONS] Most patients (87.6%) had a high or very high likelihood of local recurrence (PI-RR score 4 or 5). In patients with PI-RR ≤3 scores, the ADC value and the enhancement type may allow for better classification of lesions with a high risk of recurrence.

[ADVANCED IN KNOWLEDGE] Detailed mpMRI evaluation can estimate prostate cancer recurrence risk with very high accuracy using PI-RR score, the ADC value, and the enhancement curve type.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Prostate; Aged, 80 and over

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)