본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluation of the TARGET score for MRI-based detection of prostate cancer recurrence in patients treated with HIFU hemiablation.

1/5 보강
European journal of radiology 📖 저널 OA 7.7% 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 0/2 OA 2024: 0/4 OA 2025: 1/40 OA 2026: 8/67 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.195() p. 112572
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
40 patients included, 23 had biopsy-proven recurrent PCa in 26 lesions, with seven lesions harboring cs-PCa (5/7 on the treated side).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
However, the moderate sensitivity and specificity, low PPV and moderate inter-reader agreement indicate a limited reliability of TARGET to consistently identify cs-PCa recurrence. The generalizability of these findings is restricted by the overall small sample size.

Ehrengut C, Alberalar ND, Franz T, Horn LC, Blana A, Hadaschik B, Stolzenburg JU, Schlemmer HP, Ebel S, Timm Denecke, Ganzer R, Schaudinn A

ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To evaluate diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET).

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ehrengut C, Alberalar ND, et al. (2026). Evaluation of the TARGET score for MRI-based detection of prostate cancer recurrence in patients treated with HIFU hemiablation.. European journal of radiology, 195, 112572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112572
MLA Ehrengut C, et al.. "Evaluation of the TARGET score for MRI-based detection of prostate cancer recurrence in patients treated with HIFU hemiablation.." European journal of radiology, vol. 195, 2026, pp. 112572.
PMID 41319370 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To evaluate diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET).

[METHODS] This retrospective, multi-center study included patients who underwent high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) hemiablation for localized prostate cancer (PCa), with follow-up multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) at 12 months and subsequent biopsy (reference standard). Three radiologists independently assessed the mpMRIs using the TARGET score (treated prostate side) and the PI-RADS score (v2.1, untreated side). Diagnostic performance metrics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were computed for any-/clinically significant-PCa (cs-PCa) and two scoring thresholds (3 vs. 4). Inter-reader-agreement was analyzed using Fleiss к.

[RESULTS] Of all 40 patients included, 23 had biopsy-proven recurrent PCa in 26 lesions, with seven lesions harboring cs-PCa (5/7 on the treated side). TARGET showed moderate to high sensitivity (Reader 1-3: 60-100 %), high NPV (91-100 %) but lower specificity (54-69 %) and PPV (16-27 %) in the detection of cs-PCa, given a scoring threshold of ≥ 3. The diagnostic performance for cs-PCa (AUC: 0.57-0.79) exceeded that of any-PCa (0.54-0.64). PI-RADS showed an overall moderate efficacy in any-/cs-PCa-detection (untreated prostate side, AUC: 0.52-0.60). Overall inter-reader agreement was moderate (TARGET к = 0.60-0.64, PI-RADS к = 0.54-0.55).

[CONCLUSIONS] The strength of the TARGET score was its high NPV, implying its potential to rule out cs-PCa. However, the moderate sensitivity and specificity, low PPV and moderate inter-reader agreement indicate a limited reliability of TARGET to consistently identify cs-PCa recurrence. The generalizability of these findings is restricted by the overall small sample size.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반