AI-enhanced micro-ultrasound improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy.
1/5 보강
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced micro-ultrasound (micro-US) for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in me
- Sensitivity 92.5%
- Specificity 68.1%
APA
Imran M, Brisbane WG, et al. (2026). AI-enhanced micro-ultrasound improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy.. BJUI compass, 7(2), e70133. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70133
MLA
Imran M, et al.. "AI-enhanced micro-ultrasound improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at biopsy.." BJUI compass, vol. 7, no. 2, 2026, pp. e70133.
PMID
41658334 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced micro-ultrasound (micro-US) for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men referred for prostate biopsy.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analysed 145 men undergoing micro-US-guided biopsy (79 with csPCa, 66 without). Deep features were extracted from 2D micro-US slices using a self-supervised convolutional autoencoder and classified with a random forest model under fivefold cross-validation. Patients were considered csPCa-positive if ≥8 consecutive slices were predicted positive. Diagnostic performance was assessed against biopsy pathology using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
[RESULTS] The AI-micro-US model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.871. At a fixed threshold, sensitivity was 92.5% and specificity 68.1%, outperforming a clinical model based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), age, and prostate volume (AUC 0.753; sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 27.3%).
[CONCLUSION] AI-enhanced micro-US reduces false positives from conventional screening tools while preserving high sensitivity. It shows promise as a point-of-care alternative to MRI, integrating risk stratification and biopsy guidance into a single platform.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We retrospectively analysed 145 men undergoing micro-US-guided biopsy (79 with csPCa, 66 without). Deep features were extracted from 2D micro-US slices using a self-supervised convolutional autoencoder and classified with a random forest model under fivefold cross-validation. Patients were considered csPCa-positive if ≥8 consecutive slices were predicted positive. Diagnostic performance was assessed against biopsy pathology using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
[RESULTS] The AI-micro-US model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.871. At a fixed threshold, sensitivity was 92.5% and specificity 68.1%, outperforming a clinical model based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), age, and prostate volume (AUC 0.753; sensitivity 96.2%, specificity 27.3%).
[CONCLUSION] AI-enhanced micro-US reduces false positives from conventional screening tools while preserving high sensitivity. It shows promise as a point-of-care alternative to MRI, integrating risk stratification and biopsy guidance into a single platform.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Molecular Profiling: Emerging Advances in Circulating Tumor DNA Detection.
- Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.
- Functional-based multi-omics early prediction of radiation pneumonitis in NSCLC using AI-generated perfusion and ventilation from planning CT.
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Optimization of Wireless Breath Sensor Arrays for Detection of Lung Cancer Using Fuzzy Logic-Guided Genetic Algorithm and Multimodal Machine Learning.
- Aesthetically ideal noses created using a single artificial intelligence model: Validating literature and exploring ethnic differences.