Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.
[PURPOSE] To develop and internally validate a PSMA PET/CT–centric deep-learning framework based on using a foundational model for noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer at th
APA
Bian L, Liu F, et al. (2026). Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.. BMC cancer, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15715-x
MLA
Bian L, et al.. "Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.." BMC cancer, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026.
PMID
41663975
Abstract
[PURPOSE] To develop and internally validate a PSMA PET/CT–centric deep-learning framework based on using a foundational model for noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer at the ISUP Grade Group (GG) 1–2 vs. 3–5 boundary, without using biopsy-derived inputs at inference.
[METHODS] In this single-center retrospective cohort, 494 men underwent [F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within one month before radical prostatectomy. Intraprostatic ROIs were manually delineated. We developed a dual-path hybrid model that fuses global semantic features from a frozen BiomedCLIP foundation model with task-specific 3D PET/CT features, and used the fused representation for GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 stratification. Five-fold, patient-level cross-validation was used; prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard. Benchmarks included conventional radiomics and deep-learning baselines (BiomedCLIP-only, ResNet-only, MedSAM, XSurv). The primary metric was AUC; precision, recall, F1, PRC-AUC, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) assessed complementary performance and clinical utility.
[RESULTS] The proposed model achieved AUC 0.800 with precision 0.854, recall 0.888, and F1 0.870, outperforming baselines (BiomedCLIP 0.764; MedSAM 0.759; XSurv 0.756; ResNet 0.745; radiomics/random forest 0.676). Mean PRC-AUC was 0.928 ± 0.020 (across folds), and DCA showed higher net benefit across wide thresholds. SUVmax alone was modest (AUC 0.699 for ≥GG3; 0.625 for ≥GG4).
[CONCLUSION] The framework demonstrated noninvasive discrimination of GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 in a single-center cohort, suggesting a candidate decision-support role for biopsy-sparing pathways; its generalizability and deployability require multicenter external validation and end-to-end automation.
[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-026-15715-x.
[METHODS] In this single-center retrospective cohort, 494 men underwent [F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within one month before radical prostatectomy. Intraprostatic ROIs were manually delineated. We developed a dual-path hybrid model that fuses global semantic features from a frozen BiomedCLIP foundation model with task-specific 3D PET/CT features, and used the fused representation for GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 stratification. Five-fold, patient-level cross-validation was used; prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard. Benchmarks included conventional radiomics and deep-learning baselines (BiomedCLIP-only, ResNet-only, MedSAM, XSurv). The primary metric was AUC; precision, recall, F1, PRC-AUC, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) assessed complementary performance and clinical utility.
[RESULTS] The proposed model achieved AUC 0.800 with precision 0.854, recall 0.888, and F1 0.870, outperforming baselines (BiomedCLIP 0.764; MedSAM 0.759; XSurv 0.756; ResNet 0.745; radiomics/random forest 0.676). Mean PRC-AUC was 0.928 ± 0.020 (across folds), and DCA showed higher net benefit across wide thresholds. SUVmax alone was modest (AUC 0.699 for ≥GG3; 0.625 for ≥GG4).
[CONCLUSION] The framework demonstrated noninvasive discrimination of GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 in a single-center cohort, suggesting a candidate decision-support role for biopsy-sparing pathways; its generalizability and deployability require multicenter external validation and end-to-end automation.
[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-026-15715-x.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Clinical performance of [Tc]Tc-HYNIC-PSMA-XL-2 SPECT/CT in prostate cancer: paired head-to-head comparisons with [Tc]Tc-MDP and PSMA PET/CT.
- Uridine-Based PET/NIRF Dual-Modality imaging for precision tumor diagnosis and surgery.
- Single-cell eQTL mapping reveals cell-type-specific genes associated with the risk of gastric cancer.
- Using radiomics model for predicting extraprostatic extension with PSMA PET/CT studies: a comparative study with the Mehralivand grading system.
- Self-care and associated factors of patients with permanent colostomies: A structural equation model.