본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.

BMC cancer 2026 Vol.26(1)

Bian L, Liu F, Huang X, Peng Y, Fang Y, Bi L, Song S

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To develop and internally validate a PSMA PET/CT–centric deep-learning framework based on using a foundational model for noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer at th

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Bian L, Liu F, et al. (2026). Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.. BMC cancer, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15715-x
MLA Bian L, et al.. "Noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer via a foundational model based deep learning with PSMA PET/CT.." BMC cancer, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026.
PMID 41663975

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To develop and internally validate a PSMA PET/CT–centric deep-learning framework based on using a foundational model for noninvasive preoperative risk stratification of prostate cancer at the ISUP Grade Group (GG) 1–2 vs. 3–5 boundary, without using biopsy-derived inputs at inference.

[METHODS] In this single-center retrospective cohort, 494 men underwent [F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT within one month before radical prostatectomy. Intraprostatic ROIs were manually delineated. We developed a dual-path hybrid model that fuses global semantic features from a frozen BiomedCLIP foundation model with task-specific 3D PET/CT features, and used the fused representation for GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 stratification. Five-fold, patient-level cross-validation was used; prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard. Benchmarks included conventional radiomics and deep-learning baselines (BiomedCLIP-only, ResNet-only, MedSAM, XSurv). The primary metric was AUC; precision, recall, F1, PRC-AUC, and decision-curve analysis (DCA) assessed complementary performance and clinical utility.

[RESULTS] The proposed model achieved AUC 0.800 with precision 0.854, recall 0.888, and F1 0.870, outperforming baselines (BiomedCLIP 0.764; MedSAM 0.759; XSurv 0.756; ResNet 0.745; radiomics/random forest 0.676). Mean PRC-AUC was 0.928 ± 0.020 (across folds), and DCA showed higher net benefit across wide thresholds. SUVmax alone was modest (AUC 0.699 for ≥GG3; 0.625 for ≥GG4).

[CONCLUSION] The framework demonstrated noninvasive discrimination of GG 1–2 vs. 3–5 in a single-center cohort, suggesting a candidate decision-support role for biopsy-sparing pathways; its generalizability and deployability require multicenter external validation and end-to-end automation.

[SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION] The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-026-15715-x.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)