본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.

1/5 보강
European radiology 📖 저널 OA 28.3% 2026
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1022 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
biopsy and 79 (31%) harboured ≥ GG2 disease
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음

Sushentsev N, Arya Z, Budd J, Frary A, Moreira da Silva N, Ferrer Rodriguez M, Burn P, Hindley R, Vasdev N, Ibrahim M, Bradley A, Andreou A, Liyanage S, Persad R, Aning J, Ng ABCD, Asif A, Kasivisvanathan V, Barrett T, Hinton M, Padhani AR, Shah A, Davies L, Rix A, Sala E

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] To develop and retrospectively validate an artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) for optimising prostate biopsy decisions and improving benefit-to-harm ratios.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Sushentsev N, Arya Z, et al. (2026). AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.. European radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12361-6
MLA Sushentsev N, et al.. "AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.." European radiology, 2026.
PMID 41718862

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] To develop and retrospectively validate an artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) for optimising prostate biopsy decisions and improving benefit-to-harm ratios.

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective, multicentre, multiscanner study used data from 1022 patients. An AI-DSS integrating PI-RADS scores, automated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd), and deep-learning imaging risk scores was developed on 770 cases and validated on an independent cohort of 252 men from six UK centres. The AI-DSS performance was benchmarked against the real-world clinical decisions (reference standard) using grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance as outcome measures. Biopsy-proven detection of grade group (GG) ≥ 2 disease was the reference standard.

[RESULTS] In the validation cohort of 252 patients (mean age, 67.3 years), 137 underwent biopsy and 79 (31%) harboured ≥ GG2 disease. Compared to the reference standard, the AI-DSS at the 31% cancer detection rate (CDR) would have avoided 28 biopsies while missing one ≥ GG2 cancer. This corresponded to a 70% increase in grade selectivity (from 4.6 to 7.8), 79% increase in biopsy efficiency (from 1.4 to 2.5), and a 143% increase in selective biopsy avoidance (from 2.8 to 6.8). At the reduced CDR of 30%, grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance increased by 172%, 236%, and 475%, with four ≥ GG2 cancers missed.

[CONCLUSION] An AI-DSS that integrates clinical and advanced imaging data improves the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate biopsy decisions in a retrospective setting. Future prospective validation as part of real-world clinical workflow is required to enable clinical implementation.

[KEY POINTS] Question Current prostate cancer diagnostic pathways result in fewer unnecessary biopsies. Can an AI decision support system (AI-DSS) further improve biopsy efficiency for detecting significant cancer? Findings An AI-DSS avoided 28 biopsies in a 252-patient cohort, increasing grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance by 70%, 79%, and 143%, respectively. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI-DSS into clinical workflows may further reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and overdiagnosis of indolent disease, thus potentially improving the efficiency of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)