AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1022 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
biopsy and 79 (31%) harboured ≥ GG2 disease
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음
[OBJECTIVES] To develop and retrospectively validate an artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) for optimising prostate biopsy decisions and improving benefit-to-harm ratios.
APA
Sushentsev N, Arya Z, et al. (2026). AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.. European radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12361-6
MLA
Sushentsev N, et al.. "AI decision support for increasing prostate biopsy efficiency: a retrospective multicentre, multiscanner study.." European radiology, 2026.
PMID
41718862
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] To develop and retrospectively validate an artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) for optimising prostate biopsy decisions and improving benefit-to-harm ratios.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective, multicentre, multiscanner study used data from 1022 patients. An AI-DSS integrating PI-RADS scores, automated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd), and deep-learning imaging risk scores was developed on 770 cases and validated on an independent cohort of 252 men from six UK centres. The AI-DSS performance was benchmarked against the real-world clinical decisions (reference standard) using grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance as outcome measures. Biopsy-proven detection of grade group (GG) ≥ 2 disease was the reference standard.
[RESULTS] In the validation cohort of 252 patients (mean age, 67.3 years), 137 underwent biopsy and 79 (31%) harboured ≥ GG2 disease. Compared to the reference standard, the AI-DSS at the 31% cancer detection rate (CDR) would have avoided 28 biopsies while missing one ≥ GG2 cancer. This corresponded to a 70% increase in grade selectivity (from 4.6 to 7.8), 79% increase in biopsy efficiency (from 1.4 to 2.5), and a 143% increase in selective biopsy avoidance (from 2.8 to 6.8). At the reduced CDR of 30%, grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance increased by 172%, 236%, and 475%, with four ≥ GG2 cancers missed.
[CONCLUSION] An AI-DSS that integrates clinical and advanced imaging data improves the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate biopsy decisions in a retrospective setting. Future prospective validation as part of real-world clinical workflow is required to enable clinical implementation.
[KEY POINTS] Question Current prostate cancer diagnostic pathways result in fewer unnecessary biopsies. Can an AI decision support system (AI-DSS) further improve biopsy efficiency for detecting significant cancer? Findings An AI-DSS avoided 28 biopsies in a 252-patient cohort, increasing grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance by 70%, 79%, and 143%, respectively. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI-DSS into clinical workflows may further reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and overdiagnosis of indolent disease, thus potentially improving the efficiency of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective, multicentre, multiscanner study used data from 1022 patients. An AI-DSS integrating PI-RADS scores, automated prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd), and deep-learning imaging risk scores was developed on 770 cases and validated on an independent cohort of 252 men from six UK centres. The AI-DSS performance was benchmarked against the real-world clinical decisions (reference standard) using grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance as outcome measures. Biopsy-proven detection of grade group (GG) ≥ 2 disease was the reference standard.
[RESULTS] In the validation cohort of 252 patients (mean age, 67.3 years), 137 underwent biopsy and 79 (31%) harboured ≥ GG2 disease. Compared to the reference standard, the AI-DSS at the 31% cancer detection rate (CDR) would have avoided 28 biopsies while missing one ≥ GG2 cancer. This corresponded to a 70% increase in grade selectivity (from 4.6 to 7.8), 79% increase in biopsy efficiency (from 1.4 to 2.5), and a 143% increase in selective biopsy avoidance (from 2.8 to 6.8). At the reduced CDR of 30%, grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance increased by 172%, 236%, and 475%, with four ≥ GG2 cancers missed.
[CONCLUSION] An AI-DSS that integrates clinical and advanced imaging data improves the benefit-to-harm ratio of prostate biopsy decisions in a retrospective setting. Future prospective validation as part of real-world clinical workflow is required to enable clinical implementation.
[KEY POINTS] Question Current prostate cancer diagnostic pathways result in fewer unnecessary biopsies. Can an AI decision support system (AI-DSS) further improve biopsy efficiency for detecting significant cancer? Findings An AI-DSS avoided 28 biopsies in a 252-patient cohort, increasing grade selectivity, biopsy efficiency, and selective biopsy avoidance by 70%, 79%, and 143%, respectively. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI-DSS into clinical workflows may further reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies and overdiagnosis of indolent disease, thus potentially improving the efficiency of the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- Cribriform-Positive and -Negative Prostate Cancer-Reply.
- Predicting Active Surveillance Failure for Patients with Prostate Cancer in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Era: A Multicentre Transatlantic Cohort Study.
- Spatial metabolomics informs the use of clinical imaging for improved detection of cribriform prostate cancer.
- Active Monitoring, Surgery, and Radiotherapy for Cribriform-Positive and Cribriform-Negative Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial.